Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Exclusive interview WotC President Greg Leeds
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dausuul" data-source="post: 4758220" data-attributes="member: 58197"><p>No, the number is quite legit. The problem is, it's not a very meaningful number.</p><p></p><p>Showing that there are (at least) 10 times as many pirated downloads as legit sales is very easy, since there are pirate sites and networks that let you find out how many downloads there have been of a given file. WotC employees have stated that this is how they got their figures. The ratio might be <em>higher</em> than 10 to 1, in fact it is probably vastly higher, but we can be confident it is not <em>lower</em>.</p><p></p><p>Problem is, that ratio, while it sounds scary, doesn't actually mean anything. Wizards seems to think it implies something about profits and losses, when in fact it does nothing of the kind. To know the actual impact to WotC's bottom line, you have to determine the percentage of those downloads that represent lost sales, versus the percentage that would never have bought the thing in the first place.</p><p></p><p>And then you have to figure out how much effect cutting off legit .PDF sales will have on piracy, since pirates are perfectly capable of making their own scans and a single scan can supply the entire Internet.</p><p></p><p>And then you have to figure out, of the downloads that do represent lost sales, how many are lost sales of physical books as opposed to the .PDFs that Wizards is no longer selling anyway?</p><p></p><p>And then you have to factor in the sales <em>gained</em> as a result of the "free advertising" provided by pirated .PDFs... and so on.</p><p></p><p>I strongly suspect that whoever is calling the shots at Wizards is waving off these issues as statistical noise. Of <em>course</em> most of the people who downloaded the .PDFs would have bought the book if the download hadn't been available - of <em>course</em> piracy will drop off significantly if we stop providing the .PDFs ready-made - of <em>course</em> it has a substantial impact on sales of physical books - of <em>course</em> the "free advertising" effect is negligible.</p><p></p><p>The last company that made D&D made strategic decisions on an "of course" basis* rather than market research... Tactical Studies something. Whatever happened to them, anyway?</p><p><span style="font-size: 9px"></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 9px">*I'm not suggesting that this one single decision will deliver Wizards to the fate of its predecessor, but it's not a good sign.</span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dausuul, post: 4758220, member: 58197"] No, the number is quite legit. The problem is, it's not a very meaningful number. Showing that there are (at least) 10 times as many pirated downloads as legit sales is very easy, since there are pirate sites and networks that let you find out how many downloads there have been of a given file. WotC employees have stated that this is how they got their figures. The ratio might be [I]higher[/I] than 10 to 1, in fact it is probably vastly higher, but we can be confident it is not [I]lower[/I]. Problem is, that ratio, while it sounds scary, doesn't actually mean anything. Wizards seems to think it implies something about profits and losses, when in fact it does nothing of the kind. To know the actual impact to WotC's bottom line, you have to determine the percentage of those downloads that represent lost sales, versus the percentage that would never have bought the thing in the first place. And then you have to figure out how much effect cutting off legit .PDF sales will have on piracy, since pirates are perfectly capable of making their own scans and a single scan can supply the entire Internet. And then you have to figure out, of the downloads that do represent lost sales, how many are lost sales of physical books as opposed to the .PDFs that Wizards is no longer selling anyway? And then you have to factor in the sales [I]gained[/I] as a result of the "free advertising" provided by pirated .PDFs... and so on. I strongly suspect that whoever is calling the shots at Wizards is waving off these issues as statistical noise. Of [I]course[/I] most of the people who downloaded the .PDFs would have bought the book if the download hadn't been available - of [I]course[/I] piracy will drop off significantly if we stop providing the .PDFs ready-made - of [I]course[/I] it has a substantial impact on sales of physical books - of [I]course[/I] the "free advertising" effect is negligible. The last company that made D&D made strategic decisions on an "of course" basis* rather than market research... Tactical Studies something. Whatever happened to them, anyway? [SIZE=1] *I'm not suggesting that this one single decision will deliver Wizards to the fate of its predecessor, but it's not a good sign.[/SIZE] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Exclusive interview WotC President Greg Leeds
Top