Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Runny" data-source="post: 7264095" data-attributes="member: 6744058">Thanks Greg. I agree with the majority, the PHB + 1 rule is good. I initially wrote into WoTC to ask for an exception to allow XGE + PHB + 1, which would allow cool race/class combos, but then I stumbled upon this discussion and realized that just making an exemption for race is an elegant solution. I will write to WoTC to ask for this. On the other hand, I’m sure that if numerous AL admins asked WoTC to amend the rule, they would. So one way to get the rule changed would be to convince you and your peers. So what do you think?&nbsp; Do you think that the pros of increasing some players enjoyment are worth the cons of ensuring that all future races are moderate enough in power as to be backwards and forwards compatible?&nbsp; That is the fundamental trade from what I can glean from this conversation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Runny, post: 7264095, member: 6744058"] Thanks Greg. I agree with the majority, the PHB + 1 rule is good. I initially wrote into WoTC to ask for an exception to allow XGE + PHB + 1, which would allow cool race/class combos, but then I stumbled upon this discussion and realized that just making an exemption for race is an elegant solution. I will write to WoTC to ask for this. On the other hand, I’m sure that if numerous AL admins asked WoTC to amend the rule, they would. So one way to get the rule changed would be to convince you and your peers. So what do you think? Do you think that the pros of increasing some players enjoyment are worth the cons of ensuring that all future races are moderate enough in power as to be backwards and forwards compatible? That is the fundamental trade from what I can glean from this conversation. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]

Verification