Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Existential Comics' "Dungeons & Dragons & Philosophers"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 6475996" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I think you could probably fit philosophies into alignment slots without too much shoe horning. Existentialism for CN, Nihilism for NE, Stoicism for LG, and so forth. Obviously, more than one philosophical tradition might fit in one slot, and particularly broad traditions might overlap into several alignments, but I think you could do it. More to the point, you can use ideas from philosophy to inform what intelligent creatures of a particular alignment believe, and how they rationalize their own actions.</p><p></p><p>In general, I hold the following relationships true: as intelligence increases in a being, the more philosophical and formalized his alignment beliefs become, and as wisdom increases in a being, the more correctly the being assigns particular actions and beliefs to an alignment and so the more correctly he categorizes himself and lives his life according to his actual beliefs. </p><p></p><p>A low intelligence high wisdom being would not be able to adequately articulate his beliefs or explain why he did things, but would reliably make good choices anyway. A high intelligence low wisdom being would have an elaborately constructed philosophy, that would not only fail to inform his actual choices, but on close examination might not even correctly describe his motives or beliefs. For example, he might believe that he was being altruistic, when in fact his beliefs and actions were characterized by self-centeredness. He'd claim to be for justice, but would observably be motivated by vengeance and so forth. Alternatively, a high intelligence low wisdom being would hold complex philosophies that ostensibly had one goal in mind, but which in practice consistently delivered the opposite of the desired outcome.</p><p></p><p>One problem with discussing the intersection of philosophy and alignment is that inevitably it ends up intersecting politics or religion or both with predictable results.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 6475996, member: 4937"] I think you could probably fit philosophies into alignment slots without too much shoe horning. Existentialism for CN, Nihilism for NE, Stoicism for LG, and so forth. Obviously, more than one philosophical tradition might fit in one slot, and particularly broad traditions might overlap into several alignments, but I think you could do it. More to the point, you can use ideas from philosophy to inform what intelligent creatures of a particular alignment believe, and how they rationalize their own actions. In general, I hold the following relationships true: as intelligence increases in a being, the more philosophical and formalized his alignment beliefs become, and as wisdom increases in a being, the more correctly the being assigns particular actions and beliefs to an alignment and so the more correctly he categorizes himself and lives his life according to his actual beliefs. A low intelligence high wisdom being would not be able to adequately articulate his beliefs or explain why he did things, but would reliably make good choices anyway. A high intelligence low wisdom being would have an elaborately constructed philosophy, that would not only fail to inform his actual choices, but on close examination might not even correctly describe his motives or beliefs. For example, he might believe that he was being altruistic, when in fact his beliefs and actions were characterized by self-centeredness. He'd claim to be for justice, but would observably be motivated by vengeance and so forth. Alternatively, a high intelligence low wisdom being would hold complex philosophies that ostensibly had one goal in mind, but which in practice consistently delivered the opposite of the desired outcome. One problem with discussing the intersection of philosophy and alignment is that inevitably it ends up intersecting politics or religion or both with predictable results. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Existential Comics' "Dungeons & Dragons & Philosophers"
Top