Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Corwin" data-source="post: 376870" data-attributes="member: 1560">No offence intended, but that is completely irrelevant. You missed the entire point of my post. I said you could do it. I had no problem with the idea. My problem was with the stats you wanted to give it. Just call it a masterwork double sword. Why does it have to have different stats? It's just a style thing.  Now you are digging into your house rules to try and show why you should step off the dry dirt and onto this slippery slope. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />First, you have to decide to include this weapon in your games. Do you have a write-up of how this weapon works in the D&D system? Because it seems it can transform from a quarterstaff into a spear.Second, you seem to be allowing spears to be used as double weapons. Or is this particular spear special and different than a standard spear? I can't see how, other than it's retractable. So now you have to allow all polearms to be used as double weapons. I don't even have a problem with that. We've toyed with something like that ourselves. But to claim this particular  weapon is balanced so your sword is too is just not going to float. Both are home brewed. Both require house rules to implement.There isn't. And I recommend you just do that and call it a day.You mean if you'd need to take it twice to use an exotic exotic weapon? There is no such thing, so no. Which is why the double katana thing gets complicated.</blockquote>

Verification