Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Exp.Psionics] New issue of Dragon reveals info. (Now corrected by Bruce C.)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="woodelf" data-source="post: 1378329" data-attributes="member: 10201"><p>Unless, of course, these phenomena are subjective, in the literal sense of the word--if they are literally created by the observers, then the mere presence of a skeptic could prevent them from ever functioning, yet they would objectively function if all present were believers. And modern science would *never* confirm them, due to its basis in rigorous skepticism and objective verification. There have been some interesting hypotheses for quantum-based psychic abilities, and several of them would include strong observer dependence, thus making reproduction in controlled circumstances impossible, if those circumstances included skeptics.</p><p></p><p>And i'm not entirely certain this is off-topic. It would be a very interesting way to run powers (or magic) in some settings. It would be the logical extension of the imagination powers in Grimm, and goes right along with concepts like wild magic and the solipsistic spells (and some of the others from the Thought sphere) in 2nd ed. Not to mention, it's sort of a more extreme version of how illusions work in D&D, currently. </p><p></p><p>And it could be the basis for a far more interesting psionic combat system, one based on, basically, clash of willpower and belief between the various psychics--the defender attempting to convince herself that she really didn't believe in the attackers powers. Much like the way some people used to play illusions--if you gave any indication you weren't positive it was an illusion, you automatically failed your save (IOW, "no flinching").</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="woodelf, post: 1378329, member: 10201"] Unless, of course, these phenomena are subjective, in the literal sense of the word--if they are literally created by the observers, then the mere presence of a skeptic could prevent them from ever functioning, yet they would objectively function if all present were believers. And modern science would *never* confirm them, due to its basis in rigorous skepticism and objective verification. There have been some interesting hypotheses for quantum-based psychic abilities, and several of them would include strong observer dependence, thus making reproduction in controlled circumstances impossible, if those circumstances included skeptics. And i'm not entirely certain this is off-topic. It would be a very interesting way to run powers (or magic) in some settings. It would be the logical extension of the imagination powers in Grimm, and goes right along with concepts like wild magic and the solipsistic spells (and some of the others from the Thought sphere) in 2nd ed. Not to mention, it's sort of a more extreme version of how illusions work in D&D, currently. And it could be the basis for a far more interesting psionic combat system, one based on, basically, clash of willpower and belief between the various psychics--the defender attempting to convince herself that she really didn't believe in the attackers powers. Much like the way some people used to play illusions--if you gave any indication you weren't positive it was an illusion, you automatically failed your save (IOW, "no flinching"). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
[Exp.Psionics] New issue of Dragon reveals info. (Now corrected by Bruce C.)
Top