Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="I'm A Banana" data-source="post: 1378517" data-attributes="member: 2067">I really don't like the INT-based psions...I mean, I may be one of the only people in the world who grooved on physical spellcasters, but I *really* like the concept of a competent spellcaster who doesn't also have to be a frail little mentalist......I also like how psionics was demonstrable in 'savage' creatures. Creatures without intelligence, table manners, or perception. I enjoyed the multiclassing possibilities it gave, with Barbarian/Con-psions, Fighter/Str-psions, Rogue/Dex-psions...it enabled me to have a brutish spellcaster who could augment his own powers naturally.*shrug* Apparently, I'm in the minority, but I'm reasonable sure I'll be changing it, to the 'all from one ability score, chosen at first' idea, probably, or maybe to a system that doesn't depend on ability scores, but gives bonuses for them. Or maybe a 7th purely 'psychic' ability score.The concept of psions studying dusty tomes in towers is just ick to me. Psions shouldn't have to be bright. They're psychic, not arcane. Wis or Cha you may be able to make a case for me, but Int is just silly....It's a minor thing, though. All else is golden. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>