Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Expand the scope of mundane lore
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crazy Jerome" data-source="post: 5826772" data-attributes="member: 54877"><p>The latest rounds of ranger discussion sparked this thought, but it is more broadly applicable and has been perculating under several different discussion for some time now. The game would benefit from having a wider range of "mundane" lore that affected characters. This more accurately models many characters, and provides space in the design that has historically been neglected.</p><p> </p><p>Assumption A: Fantasy characters are often broadly competent in ways that are mundane in their settings--albeit some of the thiings they accomplish are fantastical from a real-world perspective.</p><p> </p><p>Assumption B: For simplicity of design and many other reasons, D&D has tended more often than not to lump such abilities as "magic". </p><p> </p><p>Unintended Side Effect: Character concepts that are meant to follow along with these fantastical real-world, but mundane fantasy world, abilities--end up with "magic" to do their thing. This creates a tension in class design, as well as supplemental abilities.</p><p> </p><p>Conclusion: A way out of this problem is to selectly add fantastical abilities as mundane in the game. Presumably, "magic" versions would kick in beyond that.</p><p> </p><p>You can see this readily in things like +1 weapons not leaving much room for improved weapon quality (with 3E masterwork being pretty much the limit) or mundane goods rapidly losing meaning. </p><p> </p><p>Less obviously, it affects things like healing from heal skill, nature knowledge (i.e. healing herbs), "mundane" alchemy potions, etc. Why can these not be all that great? Because Cure Light Wounds heals 1d8 and change.</p><p> </p><p>At the same time, this is not about adding Wuxia stuff willy-nilly, and calling it "mundane". Some discretion would be in order. So I guess the question behind all of this is what fantastical abilities could you see being included in the game as entirely non-magical?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crazy Jerome, post: 5826772, member: 54877"] The latest rounds of ranger discussion sparked this thought, but it is more broadly applicable and has been perculating under several different discussion for some time now. The game would benefit from having a wider range of "mundane" lore that affected characters. This more accurately models many characters, and provides space in the design that has historically been neglected. Assumption A: Fantasy characters are often broadly competent in ways that are mundane in their settings--albeit some of the thiings they accomplish are fantastical from a real-world perspective. Assumption B: For simplicity of design and many other reasons, D&D has tended more often than not to lump such abilities as "magic". Unintended Side Effect: Character concepts that are meant to follow along with these fantastical real-world, but mundane fantasy world, abilities--end up with "magic" to do their thing. This creates a tension in class design, as well as supplemental abilities. Conclusion: A way out of this problem is to selectly add fantastical abilities as mundane in the game. Presumably, "magic" versions would kick in beyond that. You can see this readily in things like +1 weapons not leaving much room for improved weapon quality (with 3E masterwork being pretty much the limit) or mundane goods rapidly losing meaning. Less obviously, it affects things like healing from heal skill, nature knowledge (i.e. healing herbs), "mundane" alchemy potions, etc. Why can these not be all that great? Because Cure Light Wounds heals 1d8 and change. At the same time, this is not about adding Wuxia stuff willy-nilly, and calling it "mundane". Some discretion would be in order. So I guess the question behind all of this is what fantastical abilities could you see being included in the game as entirely non-magical? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Expand the scope of mundane lore
Top