Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Steven McRownt" data-source="post: 148761" data-attributes="member: 2316">Ranger casting arcane magic ....uhm.... it is something that wotc call &quot;bladesinger&quot; !!!<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> If you want to make the bladesinger being a class, i think that you should start givin' a ranger just one good save (reflex?), perhaps rougish BAB, without doubt d8 HD, so you can count on a reasonable amount of arcane spell. Thinking about arcane spell failure, we have this house rule: the bonus given by his inherent casting ability (intelligence for wizards, charisma for sorcerers and bards) actually lower for an equal amount of percentile the chance of arcane casting failure (i.e. a 14 in intelligence lower the percantage by 2%; we have a feat, &quot;true combat casting&quot; that double this percentage, and thus allow an arcane spellcaster to cast in light armour nearly without problems....A new ranger, casting arcane, could have -as a class feature- a &quot;-1% per level&quot; in order to slowly dump the arcane casting failure.What do you think?Steven McRowntps I think too that a casting ranger should have arcane spells and no divine, to be the arcane counterpart of the divine casting fighter, also known as the paladin.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Steven McRownt, post: 148761, member: 2316"] Ranger casting arcane magic ....uhm.... it is something that wotc call "bladesinger" !!!:p If you want to make the bladesinger being a class, i think that you should start givin' a ranger just one good save (reflex?), perhaps rougish BAB, without doubt d8 HD, so you can count on a reasonable amount of arcane spell. Thinking about arcane spell failure, we have this house rule: the bonus given by his inherent casting ability (intelligence for wizards, charisma for sorcerers and bards) actually lower for an equal amount of percentile the chance of arcane casting failure (i.e. a 14 in intelligence lower the percantage by 2%; we have a feat, "true combat casting" that double this percentage, and thus allow an arcane spellcaster to cast in light armour nearly without problems. ...A new ranger, casting arcane, could have -as a class feature- a "-1% per level" in order to slowly dump the arcane casting failure. What do you think? Steven McRownt ps I think too that a casting ranger should have arcane spells and no divine, to be the arcane counterpart of the divine casting fighter, also known as the paladin. [/QUOTE]

Verification