Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Expectations of Play by Edition (and How You Actually Did It)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Retreater" data-source="post: 8517996" data-attributes="member: 42040"><p>My wife and I were having a conversation last night about what I see as shifting expectations of play as 5e progresses. The conversation mostly sprang from the changes in Monsters of the Multiverse, based on what I can tell from the previews. More or less it ended with her laughing and telling me I'm a jaded grognard. </p><p>This got me thinking about what the corporate written (or intended) expectations of play have been throughout D&D's history and how it might've been different based on how we actually played the game. So I'll write my own experiences here and welcome you to do the same.</p><p><strong>1. OD&D</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations:</em> Dungeons and adventure sites are presented before expendable characters, who seek treasure for greed and power. </p><p><em>My play:</em> I didn't play this edition at the time and only recently in the form of retroclones. I can say that I ran it as a rules-lite version of 3.x or 5e era D&D, with story, roleplaying, and dungeon exploration, using all the pillars of play. </p><p><strong>2. D&D (B/X, BECMI, etc.) [Note: I've had the same experience with this edition as OD&D - just differentiating it because it's another edition.]</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations:</em> Dungeons and adventure sites are presented before expendable characters, who seek treasure for greed and power. </p><p><em>My play:</em> I didn't play this edition at the time and only recently in the form of retroclones. I can say that I ran it as a rules-lite version of 3.x or 5e era D&D, with story, roleplaying, and dungeon exploration, using all the pillars of play. </p><p><strong>3. AD&D 1e</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations: </em>"Get good, bro" style tournament modules, adversarial DMing. More character options than previous editions to allow greater customization for more dangerous adventures. </p><p><em>My play:</em> I didn't play this edition at the time and haven't ever played it (even as a retroclone). I have read the books and modules. I have played several adventures for more recent editions based on the design philosophy of 1e, and they seem to match my perceived expectations. </p><p><strong>4. AD&D 2e</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations:</em> The characters are part of a large, epic story, narrated by the DM. Otherwise the rules are similar to 1e, just a lot of the "teeth" have been taking from the adventures and monsters. The era of massive campaign settings also implies large, story-driven campaigns.</p><p><em>My play: </em>My first edition I played when it was released. I followed the perceived expectations, only in my own campaign world. Very narrative-focused, kept a running tally of character HP behind my screen so I could fudge dice rolls to never kill characters.</p><p><strong>5. D&D 3.x </strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations:</em> "Back to the dungeon." Take the flavor and adversarial design of AD&D 1e, codify the rules into a unified mechanic and give loads of customization options to players to "get even more good, bro." </p><p><em>My play: </em>I totally followed the perceived expectations. Became a Killer DM, ran my adventures like tournaments. </p><p><strong>6. D&D 4e</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations: </em>Keep the dungeon theme from 3.x, but put all power based in class abilities that can be easily balanced. Instead of an adversarial DM, you're there to run challenging/exciting encounters that the characters can win. The rules are even more unified to the point where nothing will come as a surprise. Welcome new players into the hobby, including MMORPG players.</p><p><em>My play: </em>Since most of my play was at organized events, I definitely followed the expectations. </p><p><strong>7. D&D 5e</strong></p><p><em>Perceived expectations: </em>Take the theme from 2e, with the characters being part of a large, epic story - only instead of sprawling campaign guides, WotC produces campaign adventures (which reinforces the epic story concept even more strongly). Take the rules codification from 3.x but be welcoming to new players like 4e by simplifying everything you can. Don't give many character build options or splats, because that's confusing. </p><p><em>My play: </em>Most of my developmental time as a DM was during the 3.x era. As a result, I try to run 5e more tactically (on a grid) and firm with the rules - but I think my problem is that I need to run it more like 2e.</p><p></p><p><em> </em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Retreater, post: 8517996, member: 42040"] My wife and I were having a conversation last night about what I see as shifting expectations of play as 5e progresses. The conversation mostly sprang from the changes in Monsters of the Multiverse, based on what I can tell from the previews. More or less it ended with her laughing and telling me I'm a jaded grognard. This got me thinking about what the corporate written (or intended) expectations of play have been throughout D&D's history and how it might've been different based on how we actually played the game. So I'll write my own experiences here and welcome you to do the same. [B]1. OD&D[/B] [I]Perceived expectations:[/I] Dungeons and adventure sites are presented before expendable characters, who seek treasure for greed and power. [I]My play:[/I] I didn't play this edition at the time and only recently in the form of retroclones. I can say that I ran it as a rules-lite version of 3.x or 5e era D&D, with story, roleplaying, and dungeon exploration, using all the pillars of play. [B]2. D&D (B/X, BECMI, etc.) [Note: I've had the same experience with this edition as OD&D - just differentiating it because it's another edition.][/B] [I]Perceived expectations:[/I] Dungeons and adventure sites are presented before expendable characters, who seek treasure for greed and power. [I]My play:[/I] I didn't play this edition at the time and only recently in the form of retroclones. I can say that I ran it as a rules-lite version of 3.x or 5e era D&D, with story, roleplaying, and dungeon exploration, using all the pillars of play. [B]3. AD&D 1e[/B] [I]Perceived expectations: [/I]"Get good, bro" style tournament modules, adversarial DMing. More character options than previous editions to allow greater customization for more dangerous adventures. [I]My play:[/I] I didn't play this edition at the time and haven't ever played it (even as a retroclone). I have read the books and modules. I have played several adventures for more recent editions based on the design philosophy of 1e, and they seem to match my perceived expectations. [B]4. AD&D 2e[/B] [I]Perceived expectations:[/I] The characters are part of a large, epic story, narrated by the DM. Otherwise the rules are similar to 1e, just a lot of the "teeth" have been taking from the adventures and monsters. The era of massive campaign settings also implies large, story-driven campaigns. [I]My play: [/I]My first edition I played when it was released. I followed the perceived expectations, only in my own campaign world. Very narrative-focused, kept a running tally of character HP behind my screen so I could fudge dice rolls to never kill characters. [B]5. D&D 3.x [/B] [I]Perceived expectations:[/I] "Back to the dungeon." Take the flavor and adversarial design of AD&D 1e, codify the rules into a unified mechanic and give loads of customization options to players to "get even more good, bro." [I]My play: [/I]I totally followed the perceived expectations. Became a Killer DM, ran my adventures like tournaments. [B]6. D&D 4e[/B] [I]Perceived expectations: [/I]Keep the dungeon theme from 3.x, but put all power based in class abilities that can be easily balanced. Instead of an adversarial DM, you're there to run challenging/exciting encounters that the characters can win. The rules are even more unified to the point where nothing will come as a surprise. Welcome new players into the hobby, including MMORPG players. [I]My play: [/I]Since most of my play was at organized events, I definitely followed the expectations. [B]7. D&D 5e[/B] [I]Perceived expectations: [/I]Take the theme from 2e, with the characters being part of a large, epic story - only instead of sprawling campaign guides, WotC produces campaign adventures (which reinforces the epic story concept even more strongly). Take the rules codification from 3.x but be welcoming to new players like 4e by simplifying everything you can. Don't give many character build options or splats, because that's confusing. [I]My play: [/I]Most of my developmental time as a DM was during the 3.x era. As a result, I try to run 5e more tactically (on a grid) and firm with the rules - but I think my problem is that I need to run it more like 2e. [I] [/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Expectations of Play by Edition (and How You Actually Did It)
Top