Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HywayWolf" data-source="post: 4871223" data-attributes="member: 68612">I am not an experienced DM or Player so my comments may not be as useful as the ones already recieved, but BFRPG is my game of choice.&nbsp; I played mostly B/X back in the 80's and stopped playing long before 2E appeared, so you can imagine my shock when I returned to D&amp;D in 2007.&nbsp; I didn't even recognize the game.&nbsp; I wanted to play, but the knowledge base required to play 3.5 seemed very daunting. Looking back at my game of choice, B/X, I liked what I saw, but the inconsistencies seemed more glaring in my elder years than they did when I was young and stupid.&nbsp; BFRPG was what I found to bridge what I thought was missing from &quot;old school&quot;.&nbsp; It plays great with lots of room for imaginative thinking on both the DM and players parts.&nbsp; It allows for more than the handful of character/classes B/X allowed and it made combat much easier.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HywayWolf, post: 4871223, member: 68612"] I am not an experienced DM or Player so my comments may not be as useful as the ones already recieved, but BFRPG is my game of choice. I played mostly B/X back in the 80's and stopped playing long before 2E appeared, so you can imagine my shock when I returned to D&D in 2007. I didn't even recognize the game. I wanted to play, but the knowledge base required to play 3.5 seemed very daunting. Looking back at my game of choice, B/X, I liked what I saw, but the inconsistencies seemed more glaring in my elder years than they did when I was young and stupid. BFRPG was what I found to bridge what I thought was missing from "old school". It plays great with lots of room for imaginative thinking on both the DM and players parts. It allows for more than the handful of character/classes B/X allowed and it made combat much easier. [/QUOTE]

Verification