Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Experiences with Dogs in the Vineyard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cerebral Paladin" data-source="post: 5442309" data-attributes="member: 3448"><p>I don't think that the specifically religious nature of the moral questions is that important to the game--it's important to the setting, and to many of the characters, but you could totally play a Dog who is secretly atheist but cares about the moral issues. Or you could as a non-religious player play a religious character, and again engage with the moral issues as interesting issues. And then of course many alternate settings get away from the religious background entirely.</p><p></p><p>Re: a wide spectrum of views: I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it goes to issues of trust and comfort. I would ask myself the question, "would I feel comfortable discussing a serious real-world moral question, with political and religious overtones, in this group?" If your response to the idea of a discussion of, for example, same-sex marriage, is "wow, that would be totally awful, we should never never never bring that topic up," then my guess is that having a Dogs game where a same-sex relationship was at issue would also be a bad idea. And if there are lots of topics like that, so that you have to steer clear of all issues of sex, gender roles, and morality, then you're playing with the least interesting parts of Dogs, and I personally wouldn't bother. If, on the other hand, you're like "Well, Sally and Joe will really disagree over that, with Jim having a different perspective, but we're all adults who are comfortable disagreeing over these sorts of things, and the conversation could be interesting..." then you might have a really fruitful game. It can also help for the PCs to have different attitudes from the players (the cognitive dissonance can be fun), but that can also make the game less "grabby," reducing the emotional punch--it's often said that you want a moral dilemma that's designed to grab the players, not just the PCs.</p><p></p><p>The tl;dr version: Be careful about it, that could cause problems, but it could work well if the players have a lot of trust and respect.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cerebral Paladin, post: 5442309, member: 3448"] I don't think that the specifically religious nature of the moral questions is that important to the game--it's important to the setting, and to many of the characters, but you could totally play a Dog who is secretly atheist but cares about the moral issues. Or you could as a non-religious player play a religious character, and again engage with the moral issues as interesting issues. And then of course many alternate settings get away from the religious background entirely. Re: a wide spectrum of views: I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, but it goes to issues of trust and comfort. I would ask myself the question, "would I feel comfortable discussing a serious real-world moral question, with political and religious overtones, in this group?" If your response to the idea of a discussion of, for example, same-sex marriage, is "wow, that would be totally awful, we should never never never bring that topic up," then my guess is that having a Dogs game where a same-sex relationship was at issue would also be a bad idea. And if there are lots of topics like that, so that you have to steer clear of all issues of sex, gender roles, and morality, then you're playing with the least interesting parts of Dogs, and I personally wouldn't bother. If, on the other hand, you're like "Well, Sally and Joe will really disagree over that, with Jim having a different perspective, but we're all adults who are comfortable disagreeing over these sorts of things, and the conversation could be interesting..." then you might have a really fruitful game. It can also help for the PCs to have different attitudes from the players (the cognitive dissonance can be fun), but that can also make the game less "grabby," reducing the emotional punch--it's often said that you want a moral dilemma that's designed to grab the players, not just the PCs. The tl;dr version: Be careful about it, that could cause problems, but it could work well if the players have a lot of trust and respect. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Experiences with Dogs in the Vineyard
Top