Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Experimental Rules for Hot Pursuit/Horseback Chase Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 5656396" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p>[MENTION=93081]Davedamon[/MENTION]</p><p>Nice start! I have some specific critiques below. I actually ran a horse chase/combat with a similar feel - the degree they succeeded/failed on skill checks allowed them to move a number of relative squares (all speeds were 10, but I would have made lower speeds a equivalent penalty to the checks).</p><p></p><p>I like how you add speed damage to one of the obstacles, and that makes sense to use as a guideline for falling off your horse.</p><p></p><p>Some things can be game enders (stun, slow, immobilize, etc), and players love to stunlock enemies to foil a chase. On the one hand I'm inclined to let it play out and whatever happens happens. On the other hand it can totally kill the anticipation around a good chase. Like how you handle being unseated (prone), I really really like that.</p><p></p><p>I don't care for the "you always move your relative speed even if it takes you past where you want to be". Maybe it makes sense for an out of control wagon, but not for a skilled rider.</p><p></p><p>About difficult terrain, do you deal with it according to the number of (relative) squares moved, or is it like a "streaking" obstacle where it affects everyone as it "moves" through their space, thus relative speed? The second makes more sense to me.</p><p></p><p>How would you rule a charge? It's important for PCs with mounted combat feat on warhorses.</p><p></p><p>I notice that the horsemanship checks seem to use the PCs' own skills. Which is fine, but it's definitely ignoring/changing the rule that riders without Mounted Combat must use the mount's acrobatics, athletics, endurance, and stealth checks. IOW you're diminishing the value of the Mounted Combat feat (which may be fine for your purposes).</p><p></p><p>Despite those critiques, I really like what you've designed <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> It's very yoinkable, if you don't mind?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 5656396, member: 20323"] [MENTION=93081]Davedamon[/MENTION] Nice start! I have some specific critiques below. I actually ran a horse chase/combat with a similar feel - the degree they succeeded/failed on skill checks allowed them to move a number of relative squares (all speeds were 10, but I would have made lower speeds a equivalent penalty to the checks). I like how you add speed damage to one of the obstacles, and that makes sense to use as a guideline for falling off your horse. Some things can be game enders (stun, slow, immobilize, etc), and players love to stunlock enemies to foil a chase. On the one hand I'm inclined to let it play out and whatever happens happens. On the other hand it can totally kill the anticipation around a good chase. Like how you handle being unseated (prone), I really really like that. I don't care for the "you always move your relative speed even if it takes you past where you want to be". Maybe it makes sense for an out of control wagon, but not for a skilled rider. About difficult terrain, do you deal with it according to the number of (relative) squares moved, or is it like a "streaking" obstacle where it affects everyone as it "moves" through their space, thus relative speed? The second makes more sense to me. How would you rule a charge? It's important for PCs with mounted combat feat on warhorses. I notice that the horsemanship checks seem to use the PCs' own skills. Which is fine, but it's definitely ignoring/changing the rule that riders without Mounted Combat must use the mount's acrobatics, athletics, endurance, and stealth checks. IOW you're diminishing the value of the Mounted Combat feat (which may be fine for your purposes). Despite those critiques, I really like what you've designed :) It's very yoinkable, if you don't mind? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Experimental Rules for Hot Pursuit/Horseback Chase Combat
Top