Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 494231" data-attributes="member: 284"><img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f644.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":rolleyes:" title="Roll eyes&nbsp; &nbsp; :rolleyes:"&nbsp; data-smilie="11"data-shortname=":rolleyes:" />&nbsp; yes, if you disagree with it, it must be &quot;patently insane&quot;.&nbsp;&nbsp; And whining about my &quot;tenure&quot; here makes your position so much stronger.&nbsp; &nbsp; Just for the record, I have never used my longevity on this board as a reason for why I'm right about something, and I have never put someone down because they haven't been posting for as long as I have.&nbsp;&nbsp; There are plenty of people who have been posting for longer than I have, and it doesn't stop me from disagreeing with them, and I don't bring it up when I'm talking to them.&nbsp; So why are you trying to make such a big deal about it? I made one flippant comment, and you are acting like we brought the mob and torches out.&nbsp;&nbsp; I apologize for offending you. Now lighten up dude, and grow a slightly thicker skin.&nbsp; Seriously.&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; Here, you are trying to tell us exactly what can and cannot be used when interpreting the feat.&nbsp; &nbsp; You chose to limit yourself to only what you consider rules text, and completely ignore any &quot;flavor text&quot;, despite the fact that it's obvious even to yourself what the intent of the feat is (as you stated in in an earlier post).&nbsp;&nbsp; I chose not to limit myself in this fashion.&nbsp; Game designers are human, and don't always say things exactly the right way.&nbsp;&nbsp; That's when you look at the intent of the feat, which even you were able to see.&nbsp; You may choose to ignore it, but others have not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 494231, member: 284"] :rolleyes: yes, if you disagree with it, it must be "patently insane". And whining about my "tenure" here makes your position so much stronger. Just for the record, I have never used my longevity on this board as a reason for why I'm right about something, and I have never put someone down because they haven't been posting for as long as I have. There are plenty of people who have been posting for longer than I have, and it doesn't stop me from disagreeing with them, and I don't bring it up when I'm talking to them. So why are you trying to make such a big deal about it? I made one flippant comment, and you are acting like we brought the mob and torches out. I apologize for offending you. Now lighten up dude, and grow a slightly thicker skin. Seriously. Here, you are trying to tell us exactly what can and cannot be used when interpreting the feat. You chose to limit yourself to only what [b]you[/b] consider rules text, and completely ignore any "flavor text", despite the fact that it's obvious even to yourself what the intent of the feat is (as you stated in in an earlier post). I chose not to limit myself in this fashion. Game designers are human, and don't always say things exactly the right way. That's when you look at the intent of the feat, which even you were able to see. You may choose to ignore it, but others have not. [/QUOTE]

Verification