Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Expertise Dice Not Necessarily Fighter Exclusive
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ainamacar" data-source="post: 5997468" data-attributes="member: 70709"><p>I'm in favor, in principle, of introducing a generic martial mechanic that can be gained and utilized in vastly different ways, while maintaining a common "interface" to a wide variety of different effects.</p><p></p><p>The key thing is to make sure each class speaks to this interface in a mechanically distinct and flavorful way. Clearly there is plenty of middle ground on the issue, because we don't usually grouse about everyone using a d20 but there was plenty of grousing about, e.g. AEDU (and I mention it without judgment) for being too homogenous. The rest of the thread has covered the arguments pretty well, if not to the point of consensus. The common spell list with different ways of learning, regaining, and casting spells is, I think, a decent example of a middle ground I find acceptable.</p><p></p><p>For example, maybe the main fighter schtick is getting the expertise dice renewed automatically each round. That would make the fighter an incredibly reliable source for the things he does, whatever they are. What if a rogue gained ED (they should be more careful <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />) based on tactical consideration, and possibly varying with schemes? This would let us get away from "every rogue sneak attacks" to something more flexible. Here are some rough ideas (not intended to all work at once)</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain the dice if you have advantage against at least one enemy at the start of your turn. This makes "sneak attack" quite a bit more dynamic, especially because the party and the enemy both have a say in whether it happens.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain the dice at the start of your turn if you are threatened by only one enemy. (Duelist, essentially.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain the dice if you were not hit since your last turn ended. (Fits various highly defensive, mobile, and/or stealthy conceptions)</li> </ul><p>A warlord (as a separate class, or just as a different mechanism for fighters) might be based around granting ED to other characters, which could work quite smoothly if they are a generic resource. For example, it might be a much smoother way to grant allies damage or protection instead of a bajillion interrupts, because every character can at the very least use them to increase damage or reduce damage they take. They might refresh their own supply based on more strategic considerations, and maybe even starting combat with a larger-than-normal pool, to represent their tactical genius early in the fight.</p><p></p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Refresh when an enemy falls.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Refresh a random amount at the start of each turn by making some sort of "commander check".</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Refresh when an ally gets a critical hit (more of a "rah! rah! go team!" warlord)</li> </ul><p></p><p></p><p>A barbarian could use them to power a rage mechanic that is a lot more fluid than n/day or n/encounter, relying on what actually happens in combat. Unlike other martial combatants, a barbarian might accumulate these dice over multiple turns to unleash truly monstrous effects, or choose to spend them as they come in if the situation calls for it. They could refresh based on what might actually make a barbarian angry</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain dice when hit (revenge)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain dice when allies are hit (revenge for friends)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain dice when the barbarian misses (frustration)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Gain dice when anyone crits or is killed (bloodlust)</li> </ul><p></p><p></p><p>This could work well with multiclassing. For example, a fighter5/barbarian5 might have 2 ED from fighter levels, maybe just 1 from barbarian (but with an accumulation mechanic) and mix and match the possible uses from either class as desired. Heck, it could lead to the simplest version of Tenser's Transformation ever seen: Gain ED as a fighter of your wizard level.</p><p></p><p>In short, we have barely started to cover what is possible with the basic idea of ED, and there is plenty of room to explore outside the "refresh n dice every round" idea demonstrated in the playtest fighter.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ainamacar, post: 5997468, member: 70709"] I'm in favor, in principle, of introducing a generic martial mechanic that can be gained and utilized in vastly different ways, while maintaining a common "interface" to a wide variety of different effects. The key thing is to make sure each class speaks to this interface in a mechanically distinct and flavorful way. Clearly there is plenty of middle ground on the issue, because we don't usually grouse about everyone using a d20 but there was plenty of grousing about, e.g. AEDU (and I mention it without judgment) for being too homogenous. The rest of the thread has covered the arguments pretty well, if not to the point of consensus. The common spell list with different ways of learning, regaining, and casting spells is, I think, a decent example of a middle ground I find acceptable. For example, maybe the main fighter schtick is getting the expertise dice renewed automatically each round. That would make the fighter an incredibly reliable source for the things he does, whatever they are. What if a rogue gained ED (they should be more careful ;)) based on tactical consideration, and possibly varying with schemes? This would let us get away from "every rogue sneak attacks" to something more flexible. Here are some rough ideas (not intended to all work at once) [LIST] [*]Gain the dice if you have advantage against at least one enemy at the start of your turn. This makes "sneak attack" quite a bit more dynamic, especially because the party and the enemy both have a say in whether it happens. [*]Gain the dice at the start of your turn if you are threatened by only one enemy. (Duelist, essentially.) [*]Gain the dice if you were not hit since your last turn ended. (Fits various highly defensive, mobile, and/or stealthy conceptions) [/LIST] A warlord (as a separate class, or just as a different mechanism for fighters) might be based around granting ED to other characters, which could work quite smoothly if they are a generic resource. For example, it might be a much smoother way to grant allies damage or protection instead of a bajillion interrupts, because every character can at the very least use them to increase damage or reduce damage they take. They might refresh their own supply based on more strategic considerations, and maybe even starting combat with a larger-than-normal pool, to represent their tactical genius early in the fight. [LIST] [*]Refresh when an enemy falls. [*]Refresh a random amount at the start of each turn by making some sort of "commander check". [*]Refresh when an ally gets a critical hit (more of a "rah! rah! go team!" warlord) [/LIST] A barbarian could use them to power a rage mechanic that is a lot more fluid than n/day or n/encounter, relying on what actually happens in combat. Unlike other martial combatants, a barbarian might accumulate these dice over multiple turns to unleash truly monstrous effects, or choose to spend them as they come in if the situation calls for it. They could refresh based on what might actually make a barbarian angry [LIST] [*]Gain dice when hit (revenge) [*]Gain dice when allies are hit (revenge for friends) [*]Gain dice when the barbarian misses (frustration) [*]Gain dice when anyone crits or is killed (bloodlust) [/LIST] This could work well with multiclassing. For example, a fighter5/barbarian5 might have 2 ED from fighter levels, maybe just 1 from barbarian (but with an accumulation mechanic) and mix and match the possible uses from either class as desired. Heck, it could lead to the simplest version of Tenser's Transformation ever seen: Gain ED as a fighter of your wizard level. In short, we have barely started to cover what is possible with the basic idea of ED, and there is plenty of room to explore outside the "refresh n dice every round" idea demonstrated in the playtest fighter. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Expertise Dice Not Necessarily Fighter Exclusive
Top