Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ahnehnois" data-source="post: 5998304" data-attributes="member: 17106">1. The criticism you're referring to isn't edition warring. Not even close. It's clear and cogent mechanical critique that has been explained ad nauseam, one which targets mechanics from 3e (ToB, barbarian rage, and the like) and occasionally other games as well, and does not target not people who play any particular game. &quot;Edition War&quot; and &quot;position I disagree with&quot; are not the same thing.2. CS does not raise this issue. Not even close. It may resemble some other games' magic systems, but it does not have the characteristic daily use limitations of D&amp;D magic.3. Bonus feats are cool. Combat maneuvers are cool. Reactions are cool. CS is kind of cool. So are many other things. Fighters (and, to the point, their nonmagical brethren) have can have lots of &quot;cool&quot; things without raising the balance and plausibility issues of daily/encounter-ly limitations or excessively discretized effects.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ahnehnois, post: 5998304, member: 17106"] 1. The criticism you're referring to isn't edition warring. Not even close. It's clear and cogent mechanical critique that has been explained ad nauseam, one which targets mechanics from 3e (ToB, barbarian rage, and the like) and occasionally other games as well, and does not target not people who play any particular game. "Edition War" and "position I disagree with" are not the same thing. 2. CS does not raise this issue. Not even close. It may resemble some other games' magic systems, but it does not have the characteristic daily use limitations of D&D magic. 3. Bonus feats are cool. Combat maneuvers are cool. Reactions are cool. CS is kind of cool. So are many other things. Fighters (and, to the point, their nonmagical brethren) have can have lots of "cool" things without raising the balance and plausibility issues of daily/encounter-ly limitations or excessively discretized effects. [/QUOTE]

Verification