Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sadrik" data-source="post: 6050494" data-attributes="member: 14506">To allow young players or players who do not want to bother with complex record keeping or constant book look ups of powers to have something.&nbsp;Yes but again as I stated above it would be similar to the BAB of 3e. In fact the current &quot;weapon attack&quot; &quot;magic attack&quot; system could be incorporated theoretically into this concept. I am just throwing out ideas. The point is, the problems that I addressed above are not being handled with the current ED system.I agree and do not have a problem with this concept. Because something is named parry does not mean that you can only parry with this ability. Non-issue.I look forward to a very robust multiclassing system. I agree that a holistic approach to game design is key. If you focus on making one class to specific or if broad concepts are stuck only in one place then you have a problem. I think the latter is the issue with ED.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sadrik, post: 6050494, member: 14506"] To allow young players or players who do not want to bother with complex record keeping or constant book look ups of powers to have something. Yes but again as I stated above it would be similar to the BAB of 3e. In fact the current "weapon attack" "magic attack" system could be incorporated theoretically into this concept. I am just throwing out ideas. The point is, the problems that I addressed above are not being handled with the current ED system. I agree and do not have a problem with this concept. Because something is named parry does not mean that you can only parry with this ability. Non-issue. I look forward to a very robust multiclassing system. I agree that a holistic approach to game design is key. If you focus on making one class to specific or if broad concepts are stuck only in one place then you have a problem. I think the latter is the issue with ED. [/QUOTE]

Verification