Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Expertise for all Skills
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Falling Icicle" data-source="post: 6235738" data-attributes="member: 17077"><p>While I like the general way they're doing skills in the last packet, the mere +1 bonus characters start with seems rather insignificant. Having a +3 instead of +2, or whatever, doesn't really matter much, and certainly doesn't do nearly enough to distinguish those who have training in a skill from those who don't. The cleric with an 18 Wis is still better than the 14 Wis Ranger at Survival. The 18 Str Fighter is still better at Athletics than the 14 Str rogue. This bothers me. I can see those with higher ability scores having an advantage from natural talent, but it shouldn't eclipse training so easily.</p><p></p><p>Of course, rogues can choose four skills to get "expertise", but that's what I thought I'd bring up here as a solution. In 4e, every skill got a +5 bonus just for being trained. Bonuses from leveling were on top of that. This is basically what expertise does for rogues. But why should rogues be the only ones that get this? I think they should give ALL skills that are trained a +5 expertise bonus, for every class. That would certainly help to distinguish those with training in a skill from those relying on nothing but natural talent! And it wouldn't be overpowered, either.</p><p></p><p>If anything, it seems to me like most actions are way too difficult, even for characters who have the appropriate skill and a good ability score on top of it. Take, for example, a character with a 16 Dex and training in Acrobatics. That gives him a total of +4 on his Dexterity (acrobatics) checks. Even attempting a simple task, with DC 10, the character has a pretty big chance to fail (25%). A DC 15 action would be failed 50% of the time, and a DC 20 task 75% of them. A DC 25+ task is literally impossible. Keep in mind, the DCs go up to 35! Even a 20th level character with a 20 Dex would only have +11 on those checks, meaning DC 35 actions are completely impossible for such a character, and even actions with lower DCs have extremely high failure rates compared to what you'd expect an epic character with a maxed out ability score to be able to accomplish.</p><p></p><p>Giving a +5 bonus for skill training solves most of these issues, and makes the DCs for actions much more reasonable. And there'd still be a much smaller gap between skilled and unskilled characters than there was in 3rd and 4th editions.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Falling Icicle, post: 6235738, member: 17077"] While I like the general way they're doing skills in the last packet, the mere +1 bonus characters start with seems rather insignificant. Having a +3 instead of +2, or whatever, doesn't really matter much, and certainly doesn't do nearly enough to distinguish those who have training in a skill from those who don't. The cleric with an 18 Wis is still better than the 14 Wis Ranger at Survival. The 18 Str Fighter is still better at Athletics than the 14 Str rogue. This bothers me. I can see those with higher ability scores having an advantage from natural talent, but it shouldn't eclipse training so easily. Of course, rogues can choose four skills to get "expertise", but that's what I thought I'd bring up here as a solution. In 4e, every skill got a +5 bonus just for being trained. Bonuses from leveling were on top of that. This is basically what expertise does for rogues. But why should rogues be the only ones that get this? I think they should give ALL skills that are trained a +5 expertise bonus, for every class. That would certainly help to distinguish those with training in a skill from those relying on nothing but natural talent! And it wouldn't be overpowered, either. If anything, it seems to me like most actions are way too difficult, even for characters who have the appropriate skill and a good ability score on top of it. Take, for example, a character with a 16 Dex and training in Acrobatics. That gives him a total of +4 on his Dexterity (acrobatics) checks. Even attempting a simple task, with DC 10, the character has a pretty big chance to fail (25%). A DC 15 action would be failed 50% of the time, and a DC 20 task 75% of them. A DC 25+ task is literally impossible. Keep in mind, the DCs go up to 35! Even a 20th level character with a 20 Dex would only have +11 on those checks, meaning DC 35 actions are completely impossible for such a character, and even actions with lower DCs have extremely high failure rates compared to what you'd expect an epic character with a maxed out ability score to be able to accomplish. Giving a +5 bonus for skill training solves most of these issues, and makes the DCs for actions much more reasonable. And there'd still be a much smaller gap between skilled and unskilled characters than there was in 3rd and 4th editions. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Expertise for all Skills
Top