Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Explain Bounded Accuracy to Me (As if I Was Five)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9291787" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>Okay. Does this actually add any knowledge we didn't know before? "Don't tolerate jerks" is hardly some fantastical revelation. "Avoid confusing mere weakness for wickedness," on the other hand, is an extremely important point that is easily forgotten, <em>especially</em> in this day and age of extremism, partisanship, finger-pointing, etc., etc. "Don't tolerate jerks" is a maxim as old as jerks--older than language, most certainly. "Avoid confusing mere weakness for wickedness" is quite a bit newer, and quite a bit more human (in the sense that it requires fairly high self-reflection, a rare trait in the animal kingdom.)</p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay. We already know how to deal with them, and why. Many people do not know how to deal with the former, despite the fact that pretty much everyone has been in those shoes at some point. Well-known cognitive biases, such as the fundamental attribution error, or various self-serving biases, are a big problem that lots of people either aren't aware of or aren't sure how to forestall. Hence why the "gatekeeping is good" video (which is pretty clearly a clickbait title, since the youtuber immediately noted that some gatekeeping is bad and spent at least as much time talking about the bad kind as the "good" kind) spends a good minute or so just reminding DMs that communication and understanding can fix the vast majority of problems.</p><p></p><p>That sort of stuff--how to resolve merely unfortunate stumbles, rather than how to identify outright personality/character flaws in a player--is just more interesting, more productive, and more important. "Don't tolerate jerks" is something children and cubs learn in the nursery. "Help someone work through their complex issues so they can contribute productively" is a complex, difficult thing that most adults struggle with.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I have had multiple players who have some form of learning disability. For them, it is a struggle to remember...a lot of things. Not just game stuff. It takes them numerous repetitions to remember something that, for me, rarely takes more than being told once. This is exactly the sort of thing I mean: the rush to judgment that, because someone struggles to remember how the rules work, they <em>must</em> be lazy, harmful, even toxic players. The presumption that a difficulty that does not resolve on its own must mean that the player herself is difficult.</p><p></p><p>Now, the incomplete character sheet thing, I can generally grant that. Even if someone struggles to learn and remember--aka, anyone with some kind of learning disability, which accounts for about 1 in 7 people--at least <em>finishing</em> the sheet isn't that much of an ask, and if they're having trouble filling it out, the ball is in their court for getting help with that. A simple, "Hey, I'm not sure what to do" or "I know I need to fill it out, but I really struggle with remembering everything I need to do, can we work on it before or after session sometime?" would do wonders. And there certainly is a potential risk of folks doing something nefarious with allegedly "forgetting" to fill it out, namely, altering the sheet post-chargen so they have whatever background they need rather than what they chose in advance, or whatever.</p><p></p><p>But folks that are shy? Folks that struggle with getting into character? They're a dime a dozen. Driving them out of the hobby is not productive. Learning how to address concerns and work with them so everyone has a good time is rarely straightforward, usually a slow process, and frequently a unique challenge that requires patience and sensitivity. Y'know, things where it would be useful to discuss it.</p><p></p><p>Someone being a dick and being asked politely but firmly to leave is pretty much the exact opposite. It's usually quite straightforward, a pretty quick process, and as simple as being frank and direct with someone that their behavior isn't acceptable.</p><p></p><p>One of these things is actually interesting to discuss, and something lots of people would benefit from discussing. The other is exactly as simple as it seems: don't tolerate jerks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9291787, member: 6790260"] Okay. Does this actually add any knowledge we didn't know before? "Don't tolerate jerks" is hardly some fantastical revelation. "Avoid confusing mere weakness for wickedness," on the other hand, is an extremely important point that is easily forgotten, [I]especially[/I] in this day and age of extremism, partisanship, finger-pointing, etc., etc. "Don't tolerate jerks" is a maxim as old as jerks--older than language, most certainly. "Avoid confusing mere weakness for wickedness" is quite a bit newer, and quite a bit more human (in the sense that it requires fairly high self-reflection, a rare trait in the animal kingdom.) Okay. We already know how to deal with them, and why. Many people do not know how to deal with the former, despite the fact that pretty much everyone has been in those shoes at some point. Well-known cognitive biases, such as the fundamental attribution error, or various self-serving biases, are a big problem that lots of people either aren't aware of or aren't sure how to forestall. Hence why the "gatekeeping is good" video (which is pretty clearly a clickbait title, since the youtuber immediately noted that some gatekeeping is bad and spent at least as much time talking about the bad kind as the "good" kind) spends a good minute or so just reminding DMs that communication and understanding can fix the vast majority of problems. That sort of stuff--how to resolve merely unfortunate stumbles, rather than how to identify outright personality/character flaws in a player--is just more interesting, more productive, and more important. "Don't tolerate jerks" is something children and cubs learn in the nursery. "Help someone work through their complex issues so they can contribute productively" is a complex, difficult thing that most adults struggle with. I have had multiple players who have some form of learning disability. For them, it is a struggle to remember...a lot of things. Not just game stuff. It takes them numerous repetitions to remember something that, for me, rarely takes more than being told once. This is exactly the sort of thing I mean: the rush to judgment that, because someone struggles to remember how the rules work, they [I]must[/I] be lazy, harmful, even toxic players. The presumption that a difficulty that does not resolve on its own must mean that the player herself is difficult. Now, the incomplete character sheet thing, I can generally grant that. Even if someone struggles to learn and remember--aka, anyone with some kind of learning disability, which accounts for about 1 in 7 people--at least [I]finishing[/I] the sheet isn't that much of an ask, and if they're having trouble filling it out, the ball is in their court for getting help with that. A simple, "Hey, I'm not sure what to do" or "I know I need to fill it out, but I really struggle with remembering everything I need to do, can we work on it before or after session sometime?" would do wonders. And there certainly is a potential risk of folks doing something nefarious with allegedly "forgetting" to fill it out, namely, altering the sheet post-chargen so they have whatever background they need rather than what they chose in advance, or whatever. But folks that are shy? Folks that struggle with getting into character? They're a dime a dozen. Driving them out of the hobby is not productive. Learning how to address concerns and work with them so everyone has a good time is rarely straightforward, usually a slow process, and frequently a unique challenge that requires patience and sensitivity. Y'know, things where it would be useful to discuss it. Someone being a dick and being asked politely but firmly to leave is pretty much the exact opposite. It's usually quite straightforward, a pretty quick process, and as simple as being frank and direct with someone that their behavior isn't acceptable. One of these things is actually interesting to discuss, and something lots of people would benefit from discussing. The other is exactly as simple as it seems: don't tolerate jerks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Explain Bounded Accuracy to Me (As if I Was Five)
Top