Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Explain Bounded Accuracy to Me (As if I Was Five)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ezo" data-source="post: 9293564" data-attributes="member: 7037866"><p>People with such concerns rarely can commit to our schedule of weekly games, so it isn't an issue. We try, again and again, but ultimately they realize the constant interruptions and/or absences are interfering with the group's fun, so they bow out. If they are otherwise decent players, there is always an opening if their concerns change and they want to try again.</p><p></p><p></p><p>He probably doesn't play. He might hang out, or if it is a lone individual who is otherwise committed to playing, often another player or myself will run his PC in his absence, even texting him for important decisions if necessary.</p><p></p><p>For example, we had an engaged couple. The guy had a job where is would frequently be late or call to say it couldn't make it. His partner would play the PC as a second character until he showed up or for the session. So, because another player was willing to shoulder the responsibilty of a second PC, it worked out fine. Outside of game time, she could update him on everything, so it wasn't an issue.</p><p></p><p>So, if someone wants to play, is actually taking the time to learn how to play, shows up (when the actually show up), and is all-around a good player otherwise, we try to make it work. Sadly, there are times when such a player decides to bow out anyway. And course, there are times when no matter what we try, it is evident the player isn't doing what they can to in order to make it work, it's disruptive, and we let them go.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Whew... I am so relieved! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ezo, post: 9293564, member: 7037866"] People with such concerns rarely can commit to our schedule of weekly games, so it isn't an issue. We try, again and again, but ultimately they realize the constant interruptions and/or absences are interfering with the group's fun, so they bow out. If they are otherwise decent players, there is always an opening if their concerns change and they want to try again. He probably doesn't play. He might hang out, or if it is a lone individual who is otherwise committed to playing, often another player or myself will run his PC in his absence, even texting him for important decisions if necessary. For example, we had an engaged couple. The guy had a job where is would frequently be late or call to say it couldn't make it. His partner would play the PC as a second character until he showed up or for the session. So, because another player was willing to shoulder the responsibilty of a second PC, it worked out fine. Outside of game time, she could update him on everything, so it wasn't an issue. So, if someone wants to play, is actually taking the time to learn how to play, shows up (when the actually show up), and is all-around a good player otherwise, we try to make it work. Sadly, there are times when such a player decides to bow out anyway. And course, there are times when no matter what we try, it is evident the player isn't doing what they can to in order to make it work, it's disruptive, and we let them go. Whew... I am so relieved! ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Explain Bounded Accuracy to Me (As if I Was Five)
Top