Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Explain Burning Wheel to me
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lukzu" data-source="post: 2791133" data-attributes="member: 34128"><p>Actually, I was baiting you. I never dismissed anything. I said: DnD allows a lot more room for GM fiat and does not have rules for <em>conflict</em> resolution; Burning Wheel has a lot less room for GM fiat and does have rules for conflict resolution.</p><p></p><p>You called me pretensious and dismissive -- before you gave me a chance to respond to your defense against my assertions. </p><p></p><p>[Note: A year ago, I would <em>never</em> have referred to Luke as pretentious, but he seems to have... changed... as his game has garned more praise in peer (indie-press) circles. I think that a lot of what he's been saying lately might very well be pretentious.]</p></blockquote><p></p><p>Dude, you just talked about me like I wasn't in the room and then insulted me to my face. Let's pretend we're having a civil discussion, please? You could have at least added a smiley to soften the blow.</p><p></p><p>Come on, man. Let's not go round and round like this.</p><p></p><p>The thread's got my attention. I'm here to talk about BW at the OP's request. So let's discuss!</p><p></p><p>Let me see if I can adequately respond to your counterpoint. First, I never said that DnD didn't do anything "at all." For the record, let me state that I love DnD. I think it's a great game and deserves great praise. I do not consider it competition for Burning Wheel at all. More like a crazy old uncle with a motley cast of characters as friends.</p><p></p><p>And more to the point of your thrust</p><p></p><p></p><p>Let's look at the beginning of each game. Typically, in DnD the GM is handed the responsibility with developing the campaign and adventures within it. The players are responsible for making cool characters. The GM and the players are then responsible for making their cool ideas fit together in play.</p><p></p><p>BW starts a step earlier. The players and GM agree on a game concept, then make characters. The players' goals for their characters are written out as Beliefs. These Beliefs are part of the reward mechanic, but they also highlight flashpoints of conflict which will be included in the game. This is expressly written in the text; it's a rule</p><p></p><p>Here are some Beliefs from a recent game. </p><p></p><p>Tavis is an Imperial Justiciar, assigned to ride circuit at an imperial outpost which oversees a merchant's commune run by his wife, Rochelle:</p><p>"I will root out corruption in the Emperor's name."</p><p>"Horoth [Tavis' boss] has the best interests of the empire at heart. I am his strong right hand."</p><p>"I will not allow my ex-wife, Rochelle, to raise my son."</p><p></p><p>It's worth noting that the player also bought "relationships" with Horoth and his ex-wife. Relationships are featured NPCs that the player wants in the game. Lots of games have this mechanic, though.</p><p></p><p>In the game we played, Tavis was put to the test as Horoth, an Imperial Steward, tried to use his and Tavis' legal powers to break the legal charter of the commune. Tavis also caught Horoth covering up a crime that a local Baron had committed. Why did this happen? Because the player wrote those conflicts into his Beliefs. He doesn't get to say exactly what happens, but he does get to say "Hey, I want something like this in the game!"</p><p></p><p>A similar process happens when players kibbitz for any game, DnD included. However, the process is explicitly part of BW's rules and, even better, it's tied directly into the reward mechanic. This usually generates a different type of understanding and play. It's not for everyone, but most people who try it enjoy it and recognize its differences.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A little finer point: DnD uses task resolution as its primary resolution mechanic. BW uses conflict resolution. The difference is subtle, but important.</p><p></p><p>First example, Tavis' player wants to convince a naval captain to review his weapons lockers and look for a missing pistol. That's the task. The player, Thor's, intent was to determine if indeed there was a cover up going on. He rolled, won the test, and nailed his intent: His justiciar determined that there was indeed a cover up, though he didn't quite know who was behind it. Which lead to the next conflict, confronting the captain's superior.</p><p></p><p>From my days playing DnD, I remember that a similar situation could arise. A player wants to make a roll to find something or convince someone, but the actual value of the roll is up to the GM. In the above circumstance, the GM has free rein to say, "You convince him to do an inventory, but he doesn't turn up anything." Or to go with the result that Tavis uncovers something. My point is that the player's intent -- the reason he is rolling the dice -- is supported and enforced behind the dice in Burning Wheel. </p><p></p><p>In another example, another player tried to convince his criminal brother to turn over some information to the courts. We used an extended conflict, called the Duel of Wits. The player wanted his brother to turn over the information. The brother -- played by me -- didn't want to have any dealings with the law whatsoever. It ended in a compromise in the player's favor. He won and got the information, but the brother -- me -- got the concession that his younger brother wasn't to come around the estate any more.</p><p></p><p>Social conflict with compromise decided by the players -- based on the results of an extended conflict -- is a big part of Burning Wheel. I don't think there is any such conflict resolution in DnD. Such social conflicts are left either to a single roll with no compromise, or up to GM fiat.</p><p></p><p>For those of you who were asking for examples:</p><p></p><p>You can see plenty of BW characters here:</p><p><a href="http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=3" target="_blank">http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=3</a></p><p></p><p>Some BW combat done online here:</p><p><a href="http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=13" target="_blank">http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=13</a></p><p>(though it's pretty boring when it's just the numbers)</p><p></p><p>Our play-by-post forum here:</p><p><a href="http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=11" target="_blank">http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=11</a></p><p></p><p>We also have tons of samples and examples in our <a href="http://www.burningwheel.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=Downloads&file=index" target="_blank"> downloads section </a>.</p><p></p><p>I apologize for any typos or anything unclearly stated. I poste in haste.</p><p></p><p>-Luke</p><p>[/QUOTE]</p>
[QUOTE="lukzu, post: 2791133, member: 34128"] Actually, I was baiting you. I never dismissed anything. I said: DnD allows a lot more room for GM fiat and does not have rules for [i]conflict[/i] resolution; Burning Wheel has a lot less room for GM fiat and does have rules for conflict resolution. You called me pretensious and dismissive -- before you gave me a chance to respond to your defense against my assertions. [Note: A year ago, I would [i]never[/i] have referred to Luke as pretentious, but he seems to have... changed... as his game has garned more praise in peer (indie-press) circles. I think that a lot of what he's been saying lately might very well be pretentious.][/QUOTE] Dude, you just talked about me like I wasn't in the room and then insulted me to my face. Let's pretend we're having a civil discussion, please? You could have at least added a smiley to soften the blow. Come on, man. Let's not go round and round like this. The thread's got my attention. I'm here to talk about BW at the OP's request. So let's discuss! Let me see if I can adequately respond to your counterpoint. First, I never said that DnD didn't do anything "at all." For the record, let me state that I love DnD. I think it's a great game and deserves great praise. I do not consider it competition for Burning Wheel at all. More like a crazy old uncle with a motley cast of characters as friends. And more to the point of your thrust Let's look at the beginning of each game. Typically, in DnD the GM is handed the responsibility with developing the campaign and adventures within it. The players are responsible for making cool characters. The GM and the players are then responsible for making their cool ideas fit together in play. BW starts a step earlier. The players and GM agree on a game concept, then make characters. The players' goals for their characters are written out as Beliefs. These Beliefs are part of the reward mechanic, but they also highlight flashpoints of conflict which will be included in the game. This is expressly written in the text; it's a rule Here are some Beliefs from a recent game. Tavis is an Imperial Justiciar, assigned to ride circuit at an imperial outpost which oversees a merchant's commune run by his wife, Rochelle: "I will root out corruption in the Emperor's name." "Horoth [Tavis' boss] has the best interests of the empire at heart. I am his strong right hand." "I will not allow my ex-wife, Rochelle, to raise my son." It's worth noting that the player also bought "relationships" with Horoth and his ex-wife. Relationships are featured NPCs that the player wants in the game. Lots of games have this mechanic, though. In the game we played, Tavis was put to the test as Horoth, an Imperial Steward, tried to use his and Tavis' legal powers to break the legal charter of the commune. Tavis also caught Horoth covering up a crime that a local Baron had committed. Why did this happen? Because the player wrote those conflicts into his Beliefs. He doesn't get to say exactly what happens, but he does get to say "Hey, I want something like this in the game!" A similar process happens when players kibbitz for any game, DnD included. However, the process is explicitly part of BW's rules and, even better, it's tied directly into the reward mechanic. This usually generates a different type of understanding and play. It's not for everyone, but most people who try it enjoy it and recognize its differences. A little finer point: DnD uses task resolution as its primary resolution mechanic. BW uses conflict resolution. The difference is subtle, but important. First example, Tavis' player wants to convince a naval captain to review his weapons lockers and look for a missing pistol. That's the task. The player, Thor's, intent was to determine if indeed there was a cover up going on. He rolled, won the test, and nailed his intent: His justiciar determined that there was indeed a cover up, though he didn't quite know who was behind it. Which lead to the next conflict, confronting the captain's superior. From my days playing DnD, I remember that a similar situation could arise. A player wants to make a roll to find something or convince someone, but the actual value of the roll is up to the GM. In the above circumstance, the GM has free rein to say, "You convince him to do an inventory, but he doesn't turn up anything." Or to go with the result that Tavis uncovers something. My point is that the player's intent -- the reason he is rolling the dice -- is supported and enforced behind the dice in Burning Wheel. In another example, another player tried to convince his criminal brother to turn over some information to the courts. We used an extended conflict, called the Duel of Wits. The player wanted his brother to turn over the information. The brother -- played by me -- didn't want to have any dealings with the law whatsoever. It ended in a compromise in the player's favor. He won and got the information, but the brother -- me -- got the concession that his younger brother wasn't to come around the estate any more. Social conflict with compromise decided by the players -- based on the results of an extended conflict -- is a big part of Burning Wheel. I don't think there is any such conflict resolution in DnD. Such social conflicts are left either to a single roll with no compromise, or up to GM fiat. For those of you who were asking for examples: You can see plenty of BW characters here: [url]http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=3[/url] Some BW combat done online here: [url]http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=13[/url] (though it's pretty boring when it's just the numbers) Our play-by-post forum here: [url]http://burningwheel.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=11[/url] We also have tons of samples and examples in our [url=http://www.burningwheel.org/html/modules.php?op=modload&name=Downloads&file=index] downloads section [/url]. I apologize for any typos or anything unclearly stated. I poste in haste. -Luke [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Explain Burning Wheel to me
Top