Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Exploration: My concerns for the new edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5801082" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>I XPed you on another thread for your similar post - so sorry, no XP for this one!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I doubt that many players of RPGs deny that choices should have consequences. (Maybe Cthulhu oneshots are an exception - whatever choices you make, your PC ends up driven insane! - but these are outliers.)</p><p></p><p>But one major difference across playstyles is the nature of the consequences - why do they matter? I agree that 4e doesn't provide operational/strategic consequences, and at least as I play it, I tend to agree with the OP - yes, healing surges are a resource, as are dailies and action points, but I don't find that the play the same role as (for example) spell management by a low or mid level caster in AD&D.</p><p></p><p>For me, this is a good feature of 4e, because I tend to find operational play tedious, and a game that gets rid of operational consequences opens up a nice space for focusing on other sorts of consquences - sparing or killing the prisoners, for example, starts to matter not so much in terms of whether they'll help you or betray you or never bother you again (because if you get an NPC follower, as a GM I'll just up the level of the encounters to keep them dramatic!) but rather because it reveals your PC to be a merciful or callous or manipulative or expedient person. Mutatis mutandis for irritating the baron.</p><p></p><p>I don't think I'm the only D&D player who cares about this sort of consequence. I think similar sorts of consequences are meant to be in play in Dragonlance, Planescape and (perhaps) Ravenloft, at least.</p><p></p><p>I think a unity edition, if it is to lift up to its name, therefore has to support players who want to focus on one or another of a range of dimensions of meaningful consequence. Which is a very tall order for RPG design, because the same featuers of action resolution, encounter design etc that support operational consequences tend to impede focus on thematic consequences, whereas getting rid of them to make room for thematic consequences tends to undermine operational consequences (as the OP rightly notes).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 5801082, member: 42582"] I XPed you on another thread for your similar post - so sorry, no XP for this one! I doubt that many players of RPGs deny that choices should have consequences. (Maybe Cthulhu oneshots are an exception - whatever choices you make, your PC ends up driven insane! - but these are outliers.) But one major difference across playstyles is the nature of the consequences - why do they matter? I agree that 4e doesn't provide operational/strategic consequences, and at least as I play it, I tend to agree with the OP - yes, healing surges are a resource, as are dailies and action points, but I don't find that the play the same role as (for example) spell management by a low or mid level caster in AD&D. For me, this is a good feature of 4e, because I tend to find operational play tedious, and a game that gets rid of operational consequences opens up a nice space for focusing on other sorts of consquences - sparing or killing the prisoners, for example, starts to matter not so much in terms of whether they'll help you or betray you or never bother you again (because if you get an NPC follower, as a GM I'll just up the level of the encounters to keep them dramatic!) but rather because it reveals your PC to be a merciful or callous or manipulative or expedient person. Mutatis mutandis for irritating the baron. I don't think I'm the only D&D player who cares about this sort of consequence. I think similar sorts of consequences are meant to be in play in Dragonlance, Planescape and (perhaps) Ravenloft, at least. I think a unity edition, if it is to lift up to its name, therefore has to support players who want to focus on one or another of a range of dimensions of meaningful consequence. Which is a very tall order for RPG design, because the same featuers of action resolution, encounter design etc that support operational consequences tend to impede focus on thematic consequences, whereas getting rid of them to make room for thematic consequences tends to undermine operational consequences (as the OP rightly notes). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Exploration: My concerns for the new edition
Top