Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Paul Farquhar" data-source="post: 7950798" data-attributes="member: 6906155">And I think you are - or are reading different posters.The SCAG is one. No campaign setting book describe the WHOLE setting. The Eberron book doesn't, the Ravnica book doesn't, the Widemont Book doesn't, the 3rd edition FR book doesn't. They ALL focus on certain areas - some on small areas in high detail, some on larger areas in superficial detail. SCAG gives general rules for the setting, and describes part of it in medium detail, just like the other books.Those are the only parts of FR I would be interested in a new book for.Which is what SCAG is. It isn't as readable or well written, but it does just what those other setting books do - give general setting rules but only describe a small part in detail.The second sundering did not (or did) happen. WotC know the 4e changes to the FR where highly unpopular - they are never going to declare them &quot;canon&quot; (or &quot;not-canon&quot;).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paul Farquhar, post: 7950798, member: 6906155"] And I think you are - or are reading different posters. The SCAG is one. No campaign setting book describe the WHOLE setting. The Eberron book doesn't, the Ravnica book doesn't, the Widemont Book doesn't, the 3rd edition FR book doesn't. They ALL focus on certain areas - some on small areas in high detail, some on larger areas in superficial detail. SCAG gives general rules for the setting, and describes part of it in medium detail, just like the other books. Those are the only parts of FR I would be interested in a new book for. Which is what SCAG is. It isn't as readable or well written, but it does just what those other setting books do - give general setting rules but only describe a small part in detail. The second sundering did not (or did) happen. WotC know the 4e changes to the FR where highly unpopular - they are never going to declare them "canon" (or "not-canon"). [/QUOTE]

Verification