Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
extra attack and wildshape question.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GreyLord" data-source="post: 6875078" data-attributes="member: 4348"><p>I figure that the difference of opinion in the thread isn't that we disagree on the applications, but on whether something is official or not.</p><p></p><p>In this, I imagine we are at an impasse.</p><p></p><p>I won't accept something official if it's simply someone saying that's how they feel. It needs to be spelled out specifically in the rulebooks (page and paragraph are preferred). That hasn't happening, and I don't foresee it occurring, which means I'm not going to be convinced.</p><p></p><p>On the otherhand, I think I almost spelled out the section and pages where what attack actions a PC can make, how they are defined, how they reference how they are defined, and even the MM which almost blatantly spells it out (but not completely) as per the PHB definitions. If the actual rules and passages I stated and quoted aren't enough to convince someone, even if it seems to me to be completely blatant in the rulebooks, they probably wouldn't be convinced.</p><p></p><p>Hence, no one is going to be convinced to switch their thinking up or that the other side is right. </p><p></p><p>That happens, it's the forums.</p><p></p><p>What it boils down to is you can control (to a degree) what your interpretation of things is at your table. I can control the interpretation that goes on (to a limited degree) at my table. Neither one of us can really control anything outside of that.</p><p></p><p>I like how 5e seems a little loose and open in the rules (though I would say if we start down the path of discounting the attack rule in regards to the PC attack action...it opens a whole can of worms in abuse towards adding multiple attacks against RAI, but that is, of course, my OWN opinion) and the DMs can interpret things how they like.</p><p></p><p>I like the homebrew and houseruling emphasis of it all...but that's some of the stuff I enjoy. Others may enjoy other applications of 5e.</p><p></p><p>In the end, it's not a disagreement on how we play or use the rule at the table really, but more on whether our interpretation is official...and frankly...</p><p></p><p>In the whole scheme of things...it really doesn't matter. </p><p></p><p>So, enjoy the game, play it and see it as you want, and I hope you have fun with it!</p><p></p><p>I don't think there's much more for me in the thread, but enjoyed the thought provoking conversation that everyone brought up. Adieu.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GreyLord, post: 6875078, member: 4348"] I figure that the difference of opinion in the thread isn't that we disagree on the applications, but on whether something is official or not. In this, I imagine we are at an impasse. I won't accept something official if it's simply someone saying that's how they feel. It needs to be spelled out specifically in the rulebooks (page and paragraph are preferred). That hasn't happening, and I don't foresee it occurring, which means I'm not going to be convinced. On the otherhand, I think I almost spelled out the section and pages where what attack actions a PC can make, how they are defined, how they reference how they are defined, and even the MM which almost blatantly spells it out (but not completely) as per the PHB definitions. If the actual rules and passages I stated and quoted aren't enough to convince someone, even if it seems to me to be completely blatant in the rulebooks, they probably wouldn't be convinced. Hence, no one is going to be convinced to switch their thinking up or that the other side is right. That happens, it's the forums. What it boils down to is you can control (to a degree) what your interpretation of things is at your table. I can control the interpretation that goes on (to a limited degree) at my table. Neither one of us can really control anything outside of that. I like how 5e seems a little loose and open in the rules (though I would say if we start down the path of discounting the attack rule in regards to the PC attack action...it opens a whole can of worms in abuse towards adding multiple attacks against RAI, but that is, of course, my OWN opinion) and the DMs can interpret things how they like. I like the homebrew and houseruling emphasis of it all...but that's some of the stuff I enjoy. Others may enjoy other applications of 5e. In the end, it's not a disagreement on how we play or use the rule at the table really, but more on whether our interpretation is official...and frankly... In the whole scheme of things...it really doesn't matter. So, enjoy the game, play it and see it as you want, and I hope you have fun with it! I don't think there's much more for me in the thread, but enjoyed the thought provoking conversation that everyone brought up. Adieu. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
extra attack and wildshape question.
Top