Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell Feat = Extra Confusing [2006 Thread]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 2853200" data-attributes="member: 2525"><p>I think you overcame the burden, which had in fact shifted to you, in proving the ability to walk, eat, take actions, breate, talk, are all disabled when your condition is dead. You drew on the real world definition of the word dead.</p><p></p><p>I am not saying we are unable to make conclusions about things not in the rules. I am saying that when you are making a claim about something not in the rules, the burden shifts to the person making that claim to demonstrate how that IS the rules rather than just one of two or more reasonable intepretations of the rules.</p><p></p><p>In this case, we have several interpretations of the rules. Thanee stated ""you can learn any spell, you just can't cast it...that's the rules, not my interpretation of them." I am saying that the question of what spells a caster can learn is not in the rules, and hence we are no longer discussing explicit RAW but an interpretation which needs support (like a real world definition, or other rules, or context, or logic, or something).</p><p></p><p>Here are some reasonable intepretations:</p><p></p><p>1) You can learn any spell, but you can only cast spells on your spell list (the Thanee position).</p><p></p><p>2) You can only learn spells on your spell list, and can cast any spell you can learn.</p><p></p><p>3) You can only learn spells on your spell list, and can only cast spells on your spell list. Yes, this is actually different than the above interpretation, because extra spell lets you learn a spell.</p><p></p><p>4) You can learn any spell on your spell list, or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability (like the Mage of the Arcane Order spellpool special ability); and you can cast any spell you learn.</p><p></p><p>5) You can learn any spell on your spell list, or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability; but you can only cast spells on your spell list.</p><p></p><p>6) You can only learn spells on your spell list; but you can cast any spell you have learned or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability.</p><p></p><p>There are others, but I think I made my point. We are dealing with one reasonable intepretation here, and not a situation of "that's the rules" like Thanee said earlier. I think there is room for other reasonable intepretations and it's an issue worthy of debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 2853200, member: 2525"] I think you overcame the burden, which had in fact shifted to you, in proving the ability to walk, eat, take actions, breate, talk, are all disabled when your condition is dead. You drew on the real world definition of the word dead. I am not saying we are unable to make conclusions about things not in the rules. I am saying that when you are making a claim about something not in the rules, the burden shifts to the person making that claim to demonstrate how that IS the rules rather than just one of two or more reasonable intepretations of the rules. In this case, we have several interpretations of the rules. Thanee stated ""you can learn any spell, you just can't cast it...that's the rules, not my interpretation of them." I am saying that the question of what spells a caster can learn is not in the rules, and hence we are no longer discussing explicit RAW but an interpretation which needs support (like a real world definition, or other rules, or context, or logic, or something). Here are some reasonable intepretations: 1) You can learn any spell, but you can only cast spells on your spell list (the Thanee position). 2) You can only learn spells on your spell list, and can cast any spell you can learn. 3) You can only learn spells on your spell list, and can only cast spells on your spell list. Yes, this is actually different than the above interpretation, because extra spell lets you learn a spell. 4) You can learn any spell on your spell list, or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability (like the Mage of the Arcane Order spellpool special ability); and you can cast any spell you learn. 5) You can learn any spell on your spell list, or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability; but you can only cast spells on your spell list. 6) You can only learn spells on your spell list; but you can cast any spell you have learned or which you independantly research, or which are granted to you by a feat like Extra Spell or a special ability. There are others, but I think I made my point. We are dealing with one reasonable intepretation here, and not a situation of "that's the rules" like Thanee said earlier. I think there is room for other reasonable intepretations and it's an issue worthy of debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell Feat = Extra Confusing [2006 Thread]
Top