Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 3252487" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p>Actually, the feat itself is fairly clear. "You learn one additional spell at any level up to one level lower..." This wording does not limit the feat-chooser to which spell he chooses.</p><p></p><p>If the feat intended to only allow extra spells from the class' spell list, then it was poorly worded to express that limitation; you must assume that the intent was otherwise to suspect that the wording of the feat was unclear.</p><p></p><p>The FAQ entry does indeed confirm the suspicion that many folks had regarding the intent of the feat, and those looking for confirmation that the feat limits the choice to those spells within the class spell list found it in the FAQ. But it does not change the fact that the feat standing alone is very clear: the character who chooses this feat may "learn one additional spell". No other restrictions were placed upon that choice except that done by DMs who didn't want spellcasters venturing outside of their class list and those thinking along the same lines as the FAQ.</p><p></p><p>And let me conclude by saying that something being clear and something being balanced or well written is not the same at all; often the meaning of what has been written and the intent of the author diverge without acknowledgement.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 3252487, member: 3929"] Actually, the feat itself is fairly clear. "You learn one additional spell at any level up to one level lower..." This wording does not limit the feat-chooser to which spell he chooses. If the feat intended to only allow extra spells from the class' spell list, then it was poorly worded to express that limitation; you must assume that the intent was otherwise to suspect that the wording of the feat was unclear. The FAQ entry does indeed confirm the suspicion that many folks had regarding the intent of the feat, and those looking for confirmation that the feat limits the choice to those spells within the class spell list found it in the FAQ. But it does not change the fact that the feat standing alone is very clear: the character who chooses this feat may "learn one additional spell". No other restrictions were placed upon that choice except that done by DMs who didn't want spellcasters venturing outside of their class list and those thinking along the same lines as the FAQ. And let me conclude by saying that something being clear and something being balanced or well written is not the same at all; often the meaning of what has been written and the intent of the author diverge without acknowledgement. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell
Top