Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 3258290" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>It is how the feat was originally designed. You are reading into every sentence (both in RAW and by Cust Serv) things that are not there.</p><p></p><p>If it were originally designed as allowing spells outside the spell list, it would state it with something like: Normal: spells cannot be chosen off the caster's normal spell list.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As for balance, Psions get about 170 powers to choose from and Expanded Knowledge gives them about another 100+, many discipline ones for which Sorcerers already get equivalent spells. That feat was designed with those fewer number of powers in mind.</p><p></p><p>Sorcerers already get well over 600 spells to choose from (all WotC sources, ~350 spells in the PHB alone). Allowing them to choose from another 1000+ spells which they are denied for specific balance reasons is way out of balance.</p><p></p><p>I think you do not quite get the concept of balance in this regard. It refers to spell synergy, not just the ability to have a specific spell.</p><p></p><p>For example, Polymorphing into a specific creature might be balanced. However, following that up by changing into a Colossal form of that creature with a Wu Jen spell might suddenly be very unbalanced.</p><p></p><p>The more spells suddenly opened up for use, the more spell synergy possibilities that are created. The Psionic ones are controlled. From 3E to 3.5, certain feats / powers were modified / removed to get rid of certain synergies in the Psionic system. This cannot be done when you open up all spells for Arcane casters.</p><p></p><p>And, these synergies can be controlled with certain PrCs like Mystic Theurge since the caster is at least 3 levels lower (4 for a Sorcerer) with his spells in each class. This does not happen with your interpretation of this feat.</p><p></p><p>Opening up all spells for an Arcane caster is VERY unbalanced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 3258290, member: 2011"] It is how the feat was originally designed. You are reading into every sentence (both in RAW and by Cust Serv) things that are not there. If it were originally designed as allowing spells outside the spell list, it would state it with something like: Normal: spells cannot be chosen off the caster's normal spell list. As for balance, Psions get about 170 powers to choose from and Expanded Knowledge gives them about another 100+, many discipline ones for which Sorcerers already get equivalent spells. That feat was designed with those fewer number of powers in mind. Sorcerers already get well over 600 spells to choose from (all WotC sources, ~350 spells in the PHB alone). Allowing them to choose from another 1000+ spells which they are denied for specific balance reasons is way out of balance. I think you do not quite get the concept of balance in this regard. It refers to spell synergy, not just the ability to have a specific spell. For example, Polymorphing into a specific creature might be balanced. However, following that up by changing into a Colossal form of that creature with a Wu Jen spell might suddenly be very unbalanced. The more spells suddenly opened up for use, the more spell synergy possibilities that are created. The Psionic ones are controlled. From 3E to 3.5, certain feats / powers were modified / removed to get rid of certain synergies in the Psionic system. This cannot be done when you open up all spells for Arcane casters. And, these synergies can be controlled with certain PrCs like Mystic Theurge since the caster is at least 3 levels lower (4 for a Sorcerer) with his spells in each class. This does not happen with your interpretation of this feat. Opening up all spells for an Arcane caster is VERY unbalanced. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Extra Spell
Top