Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Eye Tyrant. Who Died and Made You Gygax?? Design Your Own D&D 2024X3.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9633454" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>My perspective is, people didn't like splitting up races and classes into multiple books. That's a thing 4e did, giving "the whole game" in one sense (1-30) but "only 1/3 of the game" in another (about 1/3 of total classes, 8/25.) This was widely criticized by a number of critics; I don't know if that means it could've gone over well if the presentation were better. But I'm inclined to think the answer is "no".</p><p></p><p>So perhaps the reverse path would work better. Promise folks that more levels are in the pipeline, but that the focus of design is on the levels <em>everyone</em> plays. Then it's "1/3 of the game" in one sense (levels 1-10), but "the whole game" in another (all "expected" base classes and a few extras for spice.) That might make people feel like they can be certain they'll get <em>something</em> like what they want, and thus as long as they like what they're seeing at level 10, maybe they'll like the future content for 11-20 too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9633454, member: 6790260"] My perspective is, people didn't like splitting up races and classes into multiple books. That's a thing 4e did, giving "the whole game" in one sense (1-30) but "only 1/3 of the game" in another (about 1/3 of total classes, 8/25.) This was widely criticized by a number of critics; I don't know if that means it could've gone over well if the presentation were better. But I'm inclined to think the answer is "no". So perhaps the reverse path would work better. Promise folks that more levels are in the pipeline, but that the focus of design is on the levels [I]everyone[/I] plays. Then it's "1/3 of the game" in one sense (levels 1-10), but "the whole game" in another (all "expected" base classes and a few extras for spice.) That might make people feel like they can be certain they'll get [I]something[/I] like what they want, and thus as long as they like what they're seeing at level 10, maybe they'll like the future content for 11-20 too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Eye Tyrant. Who Died and Made You Gygax?? Design Your Own D&D 2024X3.
Top