Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Facing in 3E, 3.5E and other
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 1039588" data-attributes="member: 172"><p>Because that would be the only concrete linkage between the orientation of the miniature and defacto facing of the creature.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I call that "orientation, and consider it a cosmetic effect.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you assume that it spends the entire round in the position pictured. 6 second rounds must be time abstracted, that does not also mean we have to accept shape abstraction as well. (Or at least, the degree the 3.5 rules seem to want.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They don't have to. At some point during the round, the horse made a 44 degree cant and kicked you. Not difficult to picture at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But perhaps that is too much of an assumption. By virtue of the fact that a horse <em>might</em> spin in a circle, creatures flanking it are prohibited from approaching less than 10' of one another when doing so? No, that's ridiculous.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Au contraire. By creating "fighting space" that explicitly exclude creatures and allow them to be attacked/in line of sight, and requiring "squeeze rules" to allow a creature to pass through passages that it would normally be able to pass through, common sense and simplicity are harmed, not assisted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah, but you need the squeeze rule now to tell allow you to pass through passages that a creature would easily be able to pass through according to its actual size, but not it's counter size. We aren't talking about taking extra effort to wriggle through somewhere here. We are talking being able to casually stride here, because the fighting space of some creatures is SO much bigger than their actual size.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not in the least bit. Trampling is pretty tpyically how a horse on a chariot attacks. Using the old rules, it is pretty easy to see where a horse might affect... a creature directly to one side of the other of where a horse really is. Which makes sense. But under the 3.5 rules, since they don't follow the natural shape of creatures, all of a sudden you have to make special rules for the "attack zone" of a horse to make sense.</p><p></p><p>And woe betide you if you want to make a chariot with a 4-horse-wide time...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since 5' is the resotion of the grid, I am not seeing the bearing here.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who is talking about a horse here? I am talking about a creature that is less than 10' wide that all of a sudden, because of his 10'x10' wide "fighting space", is all of a sudden vulnerable to attack.</p><p></p><p>I could see a 10' horse's rear sticking out. That's not the issue.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Psion, post: 1039588, member: 172"] Because that would be the only concrete linkage between the orientation of the miniature and defacto facing of the creature. I call that "orientation, and consider it a cosmetic effect. If you assume that it spends the entire round in the position pictured. 6 second rounds must be time abstracted, that does not also mean we have to accept shape abstraction as well. (Or at least, the degree the 3.5 rules seem to want.) They don't have to. At some point during the round, the horse made a 44 degree cant and kicked you. Not difficult to picture at all. But perhaps that is too much of an assumption. By virtue of the fact that a horse [i]might[/i] spin in a circle, creatures flanking it are prohibited from approaching less than 10' of one another when doing so? No, that's ridiculous. Au contraire. By creating "fighting space" that explicitly exclude creatures and allow them to be attacked/in line of sight, and requiring "squeeze rules" to allow a creature to pass through passages that it would normally be able to pass through, common sense and simplicity are harmed, not assisted. Ah, but you need the squeeze rule now to tell allow you to pass through passages that a creature would easily be able to pass through according to its actual size, but not it's counter size. We aren't talking about taking extra effort to wriggle through somewhere here. We are talking being able to casually stride here, because the fighting space of some creatures is SO much bigger than their actual size. Not in the least bit. Trampling is pretty tpyically how a horse on a chariot attacks. Using the old rules, it is pretty easy to see where a horse might affect... a creature directly to one side of the other of where a horse really is. Which makes sense. But under the 3.5 rules, since they don't follow the natural shape of creatures, all of a sudden you have to make special rules for the "attack zone" of a horse to make sense. And woe betide you if you want to make a chariot with a 4-horse-wide time... Since 5' is the resotion of the grid, I am not seeing the bearing here. Who is talking about a horse here? I am talking about a creature that is less than 10' wide that all of a sudden, because of his 10'x10' wide "fighting space", is all of a sudden vulnerable to attack. I could see a 10' horse's rear sticking out. That's not the issue. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Facing in 3E, 3.5E and other
Top