Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 6794145"><p>I am fine with that. But my only issue there is then that doesn't sound like failing forward as people have been describing it. It sounds more like a degrees of success system (which is cool, but it isn't what people seem to want when they talk about failing forward). Failing forward appears to be a solution to the problem that hard failure can present to story flow. If hard failure is still a possibility, then it isn't getting around that problem. By the way, I was not knocking failing forward in my post. I was just trying to explain what I believe I don't like about it (I've actually been enjoying having it explained from people like Pemerton here, as they seem to have a strong handle on what it is meant to do and I think I understand why people like it).</p></blockquote><p></p>