Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5882753" data-attributes="member: 59506">I agree.&nbsp; But that doesn't mean that D&amp;D Next can't support both.&nbsp; Why is that a problem for you?<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/erm.png"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":erm:" title="Erm&nbsp; &nbsp; :erm:" data-shortname=":erm:" />&nbsp;&nbsp;No, I think I'll keep it as it was, thank you very much.&nbsp;&nbsp;What part of a unifying edition do you not understand...?&nbsp; If you consider the goals of D&amp;D Next as abject folly, then why are you here in the D&amp;D Next forums...?&nbsp;Seems to me that posting in a thread, in a forum about the next edition of D&amp;D, an edition that has stated it's goals as unyeildingly unifying, when one is against that very notion...that is abject folly.&nbsp;&nbsp;If you haven't figured it out by now, by reading this thread, then you're simply not ever going to understand it.&nbsp; That's okay though, you don't have to.&nbsp; What would be nice from you though, is tolerance for opinions and desires that don't match your own, whether you understand them or not.&nbsp; May as well simply start accepting that and move on.&nbsp; Leave talk of the inclusion of things in D&amp;D Next that you don't like, to those that do like them, and just be happy that D&amp;D Next will also continue to have what you want.&nbsp;<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool&nbsp; &nbsp; :cool:"&nbsp; data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5882753, member: 59506"] I agree. But that doesn't mean that D&D Next can't support [I]both[/I]. Why is that a problem for you?:erm: No, I think I'll keep it as it was, thank you very much. What part of a [I]unifying[/I] edition do you not understand...? If you consider the goals of D&D Next as [I]abject folly[/I], then why are you here in the D&D Next forums...? Seems to me that posting in a thread, in a forum about the next edition of D&D, an edition that has stated it's goals as unyeildingly [I]unifying[/I], when one is against that very notion...that is [I]abject folly[/I]. If you haven't figured it out by now, by reading this thread, then you're simply not ever going to understand it. That's okay though, you don't have to. What would be nice from you though, is tolerance for opinions and desires that don't match your own, whether you understand them or not. May as well simply start accepting that and move on. Leave talk of the inclusion of things in D&D Next that you don't like, to those that do like them, and just be happy that D&D Next will also continue to have what you want. :cool: [/QUOTE]

Verification