NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="celloshane" data-source="post: 5048763" data-attributes="member: 21523">That's excellent as differing viewpoints are vital to lively debate.  Since debate is often useful for shaping informed opinions I must now ask, do you have a rebuttal?  <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses    B-)" data-shortname="B-)" />As for the OP, I've been frustrated with 4e's fit for my gaming style for some time now.  There are many features of 4e I like, while others are very off-putting.  It's like putting on a pair of pants and finding that one measurement is perfect but the other is way off.  You want to keep the pants because they're in style, but you know someone's going to have to do some major tailoring before you can wear them.I'm not ready to give up on houseruling 4e yet.  I've got a couple ideas, but I haven't gotten very far on writing them down and codifying them into actual rules yet.  It's been mentioned before but it bears repeating: A 4e version of Unearthed Arcana (3e style) would probably help a lot.  All in all it's very frustrating, both 3.x and 4e need a significant amount of modification (that I don't really have time for) but I'm not knowledgeable enough about other systems to know if I should be looking at another one.  (Well not counting PF, TB, and a little RQ, all of which have some elements I like).  Anyway, like Merc I'm still examining my options and trying to decide which is best for me.</blockquote>

Verification