Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mokona" data-source="post: 3650437" data-attributes="member: 24891">Spells per DaySounds like we've moved away from D&amp;D-style spell memorization.&nbsp; If we haven't then the Mage (or Priest) class might contain two spellcaster tracks.&nbsp; One that roughly maps to Sorcerer (innate spells) and another for Wizard (spellbooks).Whatever feat or talent you take to open up one of the two magic traditions (innate versus spellbooks) would say: &quot;For each additional level you take in this class, you may choose to assign that level to one instance of this talent.&quot;While the wording could use some work, the concept is that if you take both the talent for Sorcerer and the talent for Wizard you could have both types of spells.&nbsp; However, a 10th level Mage that was a Sorcerer/Wizard would have to divide up his Mage levels between the two spellcasting talents.&nbsp; So he could be a Sorcerer 1/Wizard 9 or Sorcerer 5/Wizard 5.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mokona, post: 3650437, member: 24891"] [b]Spells per Day[/b] Sounds like we've moved away from [B]D&D[/B]-style spell memorization. If we haven't then the Mage (or Priest) class might contain two spellcaster tracks. One that roughly maps to Sorcerer (innate spells) and another for Wizard (spellbooks). Whatever feat or talent you take to open up one of the two magic traditions (innate versus spellbooks) would say: "For each additional level you take in this class, you may choose to assign that level to one instance of this talent." While the wording could use some work, the concept is that if you take both the talent for Sorcerer and the talent for Wizard you could have both types of spells. However, a 10th level Mage that was a Sorcerer/Wizard would have to divide up his Mage levels between the two spellcasting talents. So he could be a Sorcerer 1/Wizard 9 or Sorcerer 5/Wizard 5. [/QUOTE]

Verification