Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Flynn" data-source="post: 3679927" data-attributes="member: 1836">Thanks, guys, for the vote of support. We are definitely excited about the potentials behind it.Actually, what I probably should have said is that I'm looking for some kind of precedence of s a similar system that has already been published prior to this year that pursued something like that. Just looking to make sure we can back up as many things as we can through either OGC that has been previously published (2006 or earlier), or that directly stems from mathematical progressions.So far, we're doing a pretty good job of it, but there are some things that will, by necessity, be different, just because of the legal issues involved. Our design is to make this as modular as possible, though, so you can drop in a House Rule on your own to cover those areas that we feel might be legally ambiguous (mostly a CYA thing), or you can look at our alternative for that and decide that's cool with you, too.In the end, we really are working together to build the best product possible for you guys. Doing anything less than that would not be worth all this effort.With Regards,Flynn</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Flynn, post: 3679927, member: 1836"] Thanks, guys, for the vote of support. We are definitely excited about the potentials behind it. Actually, what I probably should have said is that I'm looking for some kind of precedence of s a similar system that has already been published prior to this year that pursued something like that. Just looking to make sure we can back up as many things as we can through either OGC that has been previously published (2006 or earlier), or that directly stems from mathematical progressions. So far, we're doing a pretty good job of it, but there are some things that will, by necessity, be different, just because of the legal issues involved. Our design is to make this as modular as possible, though, so you can drop in a House Rule on your own to cover those areas that we feel might be legally ambiguous (mostly a CYA thing), or you can look at our alternative for that and decide that's cool with you, too. In the end, we really are working together to build the best product possible for you guys. Doing anything less than that would not be worth all this effort. With Regards, Flynn [/QUOTE]

Verification