Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Gwarh" data-source="post: 3763662" data-attributes="member: 42598">I've been lurking through the entire lifespan of this thread, but thought I better chime in with my support for the project.I am really looking foreward to what both of you come up with. I personally will be buying this PDF as well as D&D4E. I doubt they will be exactly the same, and the PDF will be much cheaper than the new 4E Books. Frankly I want them both.It will be neet to see just how this project handles this and that compared to the 4E way of doing things when it finally comes out. I feel your project is still valid and absolutly you should press forward.Thinking that 4E will make your Fantasy Concepts work moot, is like saying that the 3E or 3.5E books would make all the indie 3'rd ed books moot as well. And judging by the amount of Indie 3E books availible here at the ENWorld Store that statement is plain silly.I'd wager after 4E comes out there will be a dozen variants/mods/houserule PDF booklets for sale from indie publishers withing the first few months. So why not push ahead and e-publish your Fantasy Concepts book. I think if anything the 4E announcement might even bring a few more sales from those Rabid fans who can't wait till next june.I mean heck, you can even release another version of Fantasy Concepts, say FC2E when 4E comes out. With your own take on 4E, melding the best of the new into your FC ruleset.ALSOWhy not start one of those PAY PAL hostage funds (er whatever you call them). Then folks like myself can donate a $10 or a $20 to show support for the project. You can always add the names of the financial supports to the PDF as a show of appreciation. I know other co's and Game Writers have done the same before and it's worked well for them.Food for though  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

Verification