Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fantasy Grounds Previews of Tasha's Cauldron
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aaron L" data-source="post: 8116790" data-attributes="member: 926"><p>So... people have been saying that they are changing the number of times that <em>Bladesingers</em> can use the <em>Bladesong </em>each day because there was a "problem" with some players using the <em>Bladesong </em>just to increase their AC and Concentration check bonus for them just to cast spells, rather than wading into melee combat to attack with their weapons. Is that right?</p><p></p><p>OK then, I just have to ask... what is the problem here? That was exactly what the <em>Bladesong </em>was created for. The <em>Bladesong </em>was supposed to be a defensive martial art that allows spellcasters to defend themselves with their weapons as they cast spells in combat. Isn't that exactly what these players are doing? I'm afraid I just don't see at all what the problem is. </p><p></p><p>This entire situation smacks of some writers wanting to try to <strong><em>force </em></strong>a certain playstyle on players, which was one of the main problems with 4th Edition, with the writers forcing every PC of each class to play in a certain playstyle and not allowing for any deviations from that style or your character was completely ineffective. </p><p></p><p>This is <em>bad</em> design. </p><p></p><p>Let players play their own PCs however they wish to. I play my own Bladesinger by going into melee combat and mixing weapon attacks with spells, and I think it is a boring waste to do otherwise, but there is no reason to try to <em>force </em>everyone into playing that way, and trying to <em>enforce </em>a certain playstyle on players is absolutely <strong>not </strong>the place of the game designers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aaron L, post: 8116790, member: 926"] So... people have been saying that they are changing the number of times that [I]Bladesingers[/I] can use the [I]Bladesong [/I]each day because there was a "problem" with some players using the [I]Bladesong [/I]just to increase their AC and Concentration check bonus for them just to cast spells, rather than wading into melee combat to attack with their weapons. Is that right? OK then, I just have to ask... what is the problem here? That was exactly what the [I]Bladesong [/I]was created for. The [I]Bladesong [/I]was supposed to be a defensive martial art that allows spellcasters to defend themselves with their weapons as they cast spells in combat. Isn't that exactly what these players are doing? I'm afraid I just don't see at all what the problem is. This entire situation smacks of some writers wanting to try to [B][I]force [/I][/B]a certain playstyle on players, which was one of the main problems with 4th Edition, with the writers forcing every PC of each class to play in a certain playstyle and not allowing for any deviations from that style or your character was completely ineffective. This is [I]bad[/I] design. Let players play their own PCs however they wish to. I play my own Bladesinger by going into melee combat and mixing weapon attacks with spells, and I think it is a boring waste to do otherwise, but there is no reason to try to [I]force [/I]everyone into playing that way, and trying to [I]enforce [/I]a certain playstyle on players is absolutely [B]not [/B]the place of the game designers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fantasy Grounds Previews of Tasha's Cauldron
Top