Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fantasy Grounds Previews of Tasha's Cauldron
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aaron L" data-source="post: 8117915" data-attributes="member: 926"><p>And that's an <strong><em>absolutely </em></strong>good and thing! <em>For your world. </em></p><p></p><p>But retconning the lore of the <em>Bladesinger </em>as being something open to all races by default, rather than the special racial champions of the Elves, means that some players will come to the table <em>expecting </em>to be able to play, say, a Dwarven <em>Bladesinger</em>, and will feel resentful if the DM tells them that his <em>Bladesingers </em>are the original, special, semi-legendary Elf-only racial champions.</p><p></p><p>I have seen this sort of thing happen more than once with players wanting to play Dragonborn in my brother's campaign, which is in a world that <em>has no Dragonborn</em> as he despises the gaudiness of the race, and the players became resentful and sullen because they weren't allowed to play the race since it was included in the PHB, even though the DM explained that he does not like the race at all and that dragonpeople do not fit with the style and themes of his world. As I have said before, I despise the Dragonborn, but if they had been included in the DMG as an optional race which DMs could choose to include I would have been fine with it, but instead they chose to include them right in the PHB, making this new race suddenly as common as Gnomes (!!!) and all-but forcing DMs to shoe-horn them into their worlds.</p><p></p><p>The DM's note provided in the SCAG was fine, explaining that by default the role of <em>Bladesingers </em>was restricted to Elves only as the champions of the Elven people, but that DMs could alter that fact for their own campaigns if they so chose, and it should have been left at that.</p><p></p><p>This idea of removing any and all racial restrictions on important cultural roles is just a <em>horrible </em>idea, and only serves to take away flavor and render worlds more flat and lifeless (one could even go so far as to label it cultural appropriation of an extremely important and unique Elven cultural role, and I could easily envision the Elves going to war against the thieves of this sacred Elven tradition.) Bladesingers weren't just one more type of Wizard... <em>they were the elite champions of the Elven people!</em> But now they've been reduced to just another run-of-the-mill variant of Wizard that uses swords. Its rarity, specialness, and meaning has been totally stripped away. And that is nothing but a <em>loss</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aaron L, post: 8117915, member: 926"] And that's an [B][I]absolutely [/I][/B]good and thing! [I]For your world. [/I] But retconning the lore of the [I]Bladesinger [/I]as being something open to all races by default, rather than the special racial champions of the Elves, means that some players will come to the table [I]expecting [/I]to be able to play, say, a Dwarven [I]Bladesinger[/I], and will feel resentful if the DM tells them that his [I]Bladesingers [/I]are the original, special, semi-legendary Elf-only racial champions. I have seen this sort of thing happen more than once with players wanting to play Dragonborn in my brother's campaign, which is in a world that [I]has no Dragonborn[/I] as he despises the gaudiness of the race, and the players became resentful and sullen because they weren't allowed to play the race since it was included in the PHB, even though the DM explained that he does not like the race at all and that dragonpeople do not fit with the style and themes of his world. As I have said before, I despise the Dragonborn, but if they had been included in the DMG as an optional race which DMs could choose to include I would have been fine with it, but instead they chose to include them right in the PHB, making this new race suddenly as common as Gnomes (!!!) and all-but forcing DMs to shoe-horn them into their worlds. The DM's note provided in the SCAG was fine, explaining that by default the role of [I]Bladesingers [/I]was restricted to Elves only as the champions of the Elven people, but that DMs could alter that fact for their own campaigns if they so chose, and it should have been left at that. This idea of removing any and all racial restrictions on important cultural roles is just a [I]horrible [/I]idea, and only serves to take away flavor and render worlds more flat and lifeless (one could even go so far as to label it cultural appropriation of an extremely important and unique Elven cultural role, and I could easily envision the Elves going to war against the thieves of this sacred Elven tradition.) Bladesingers weren't just one more type of Wizard... [I]they were the elite champions of the Elven people![/I] But now they've been reduced to just another run-of-the-mill variant of Wizard that uses swords. Its rarity, specialness, and meaning has been totally stripped away. And that is nothing but a [I]loss[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Fantasy Grounds Previews of Tasha's Cauldron
Top