Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
FAQ Errors
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Felix" data-source="post: 2949176" data-attributes="member: 3929"><p>The FAQ is possibly the least trusted rules source on these boards, at least in the Rules Forum. Some folks don't understand why lots of posters dislike the FAQ, and others who don't like it lack the resources to fully support their dislike of it. So in this thread I will compile all the instances where the FAQ is demonstrably contrary to the RAW.</p><p></p><p>Problem: I'm not intimiately familiar with all of them. So please, post your thoughts and provide citations if you can. Thanks.</p><p></p><p>The criteria will be that assuming the FAQ did not exist, what does the RAW say about the subject. It will be noted if and when the RAW is ambiguous.</p><p></p><p>-----------------------</p><p></p><p>1. The FAQ states Sunder may be used multiple times in a full attack. (version 6/21/06)</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Table 8-2 clearly shows that sunder is specifically a Standard Action and may not be used when iterative attacks are available by the lack of Footnote 7.</li> </ul><p></p><p>2. The FAQ contradicts itself as to provocation of an AoO when standing up from prone as a free action using Tumble. (version 2/25/05)</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">pp 24-25 that standing up as a free action with a DC 35 Tumble check provokes an attack of opportunity</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">pp 26-27 states that standing up as a free action with a DC 35 Tumble check does not provoke an attack of opportunity</li> </ul><p></p><p>3. The FAQ contradicts itself as to the ability of a monk to use gauntlets and their eligibility for use in a flurry of blows. (version 6/21/2006)</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">pp 11-12 states that a gauntlet is technically not an unarmed strike and an attack with one could not be part of a flurry of blows</li> </ul> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">p 12 (the next entry) states that "a strike with a gauntlet is ... considered an unarmed attack" and thus may be used in a flurry of blows.</li> </ul><p></p><p>4. The FAQ states that weapon categories (light, one-handed, two-handed) are dependent upon how the weapon is wielded. (version 6/21/06)</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">pp 26-27 states: "A medium character using a medium longsword in two hands is using a 'two-handed' weapon." This means that a sword's HP and hardness change depenedent upon how many hands are upon the hilt.</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Felix, post: 2949176, member: 3929"] The FAQ is possibly the least trusted rules source on these boards, at least in the Rules Forum. Some folks don't understand why lots of posters dislike the FAQ, and others who don't like it lack the resources to fully support their dislike of it. So in this thread I will compile all the instances where the FAQ is demonstrably contrary to the RAW. Problem: I'm not intimiately familiar with all of them. So please, post your thoughts and provide citations if you can. Thanks. The criteria will be that assuming the FAQ did not exist, what does the RAW say about the subject. It will be noted if and when the RAW is ambiguous. ----------------------- 1. The FAQ states Sunder may be used multiple times in a full attack. (version 6/21/06) [list]Table 8-2 clearly shows that sunder is specifically a Standard Action and may not be used when iterative attacks are available by the lack of Footnote 7.[/list] 2. The FAQ contradicts itself as to provocation of an AoO when standing up from prone as a free action using Tumble. (version 2/25/05) [list]pp 24-25 that standing up as a free action with a DC 35 Tumble check provokes an attack of opportunity[/list] [list]pp 26-27 states that standing up as a free action with a DC 35 Tumble check does not provoke an attack of opportunity[/list] 3. The FAQ contradicts itself as to the ability of a monk to use gauntlets and their eligibility for use in a flurry of blows. (version 6/21/2006) [list]pp 11-12 states that a gauntlet is technically not an unarmed strike and an attack with one could not be part of a flurry of blows[/list] [list]p 12 (the next entry) states that "a strike with a gauntlet is ... considered an unarmed attack" and thus may be used in a flurry of blows.[/list] 4. The FAQ states that weapon categories (light, one-handed, two-handed) are dependent upon how the weapon is wielded. (version 6/21/06) [list]pp 26-27 states: "A medium character using a medium longsword in two hands is using a 'two-handed' weapon." This means that a sword's HP and hardness change depenedent upon how many hands are upon the hilt.[/list] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
FAQ Errors
Top