Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="astriemer" data-source="post: 2278841" data-attributes="member: 19771">I have now included the unanswered questions. Good points about cleaning it up. I debated with myself about changing the wording of the questions and almost did so, but didn't want to misquote others, you're point about not remembering what exactly we wrote is a good one (though you can just do a search to see). As a result I haven't changed the question wordings yet.Is the general concensus to prefer to have the questions trimmed down/rephrased or kept as originally asked?Doh! I was going to rename the file at one point and forgot. That and the links back to the main file have been added in this new draft. And I've renamed and reorganized the files somewhat.Also, I've made most of the changes, but am not sure about the following:Main file:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: patch - potentially there could still be people out there who have not patched their copy correct?</li> </ul>Magical Classes:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Re: deleting first question - why? might not others have the same question?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: charm & compel specialist feat - yes they now exist, but if you don't have LA you might not know that</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: spell focus - others might still wonder</li> </ul>Spell Elements<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: metamagic feats - until the compliation comes out it should be included then correct?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: 0 MP stacking - while it might have come out before the final publication, we had one player who didn't read the rules thoroughly and it would have helped him...though he probably wouldn't have read the FAQ closely either  :\ </li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: rephrasing "why build a system like this?" question - doesn't it read okay now?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: page numbering removed - why, shouldn't we know what page the reference comes from? Are some of the page number references wrong?</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">re: Diogenes - someone was curious about the spelling, so I think it wouldn't hurt to leave in</li> </ul>Thanks for the feedback. I won't post another version of the FAQ until I've made a bunch of changes (assuming that I get more suggestions), but wanted to at least get the file naming stuff changed before people start giving me feedback.So here's version 2 of the draft.</blockquote>

Verification