Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Faq
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="astriemer" data-source="post: 2281739" data-attributes="member: 19771"><p>Good point about the patch.</p><p></p><p>Interesting point about the page numbers, grammar errors, et cetera. I guess I was thinking that the FAQ would be both a FAQ and also a Errata like work (since the Appendici do not have corrections ala errata style). I will break those into two separate works, one a FAQ that is revision independent (mostly) and that doesn't answer questions that are answered clearly in the text and a second section that is corrections/comments/errata like questions with answers.</p><p></p><p>Regarding the LA related stuff that covers information left out of EoM, I think it is helpful to include the points about what is in LA (that isn't in EoM) as while it is like a complete work and most people will buy both, until one has bought LA (perhaps funds are running low for a while) it is helpful to know that somethings have been taken care of in it.</p><p></p><p></p><p>A purty pdf, perfect!</p><p></p><p>I've made some major changes to the structure. There are now two sections: FAQ and Errata. I hope that it is okay for me to include the material from Appendix Two and the Infusion Revision. If not, let me know and I'll remove it. Hopefully that will help with some of the questions regarding what to include or not and where to put it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="astriemer, post: 2281739, member: 19771"] Good point about the patch. Interesting point about the page numbers, grammar errors, et cetera. I guess I was thinking that the FAQ would be both a FAQ and also a Errata like work (since the Appendici do not have corrections ala errata style). I will break those into two separate works, one a FAQ that is revision independent (mostly) and that doesn't answer questions that are answered clearly in the text and a second section that is corrections/comments/errata like questions with answers. Regarding the LA related stuff that covers information left out of EoM, I think it is helpful to include the points about what is in LA (that isn't in EoM) as while it is like a complete work and most people will buy both, until one has bought LA (perhaps funds are running low for a while) it is helpful to know that somethings have been taken care of in it. A purty pdf, perfect! I've made some major changes to the structure. There are now two sections: FAQ and Errata. I hope that it is okay for me to include the material from Appendix Two and the Infusion Revision. If not, let me know and I'll remove it. Hopefully that will help with some of the questions regarding what to include or not and where to put it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Faq
Top