Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Favorite actual/wished for fantasy character that wouldn't work well with D&D rules
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 5147055" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>Which is like saying that playing a game of Call of Cthulu which doesn't end with everyone insane or dead is "no longer playing the game as it was designed". You are conflating a particular sterotype of play with all the possible play available under the rules. It's perfectly possible to play a session or even a whole campaign of Chaosium Call of Cthullu with no mythos elements at all, or <em>even with no supernatural elements at all</em>. For example, I can imagine running non-supernatural horror elements under Chaosium CoC such as a game set in the trenches of WWI, or a game in which you Victorian era explorers of Africa, the Amazon, or Antarctica (read "you are modern big badass adventurers"). Neither game need have anything more than mundane horror in it.</p><p></p><p>I could also run a game of D&D set in the trenches of WWI or where you are 'real world' explorers of Africa, the Amazon, or Antartica which would be every bit as grim and gritty as the Chaosium Call of Cthullu game in the same setting. Granted, I'd have to port in house rules for horror/madness (from Ravenloft, a D&D setting) and firearms (from Ken's Grim and Gritty rules), and maybe add some additional non-standard class options like 'Explorer' and 'Scholar' (many options here) to provide mundane variaty, but it would be rules written for a D&D game being used in a non-traditional manner.</p><p></p><p>And here's the really important part. I don't know if anyone has ever ran CoC with no supernatural elements for any extended period, but I do know that people have ran D&D in highly non-traditional settings for extended periods. One of the coolest settings I've heard about at EnWorld was someone was running Ice Age/Stone Age D&D. You can't say to some running a game of D&D set in real world Rome that they aren't playing D&D just because there are no dragons and fireballs. It's a very non-traditional game of D&D, but its still recognizably D&D in its mechanics. And mechanics are what this thread is about. The fact that the fluff traditionally implies that the mechanics represent something else is irrevelent. The question is, can the mechanics handle being repurposed for some other non-traditional fluff like 'everyman struggling in heroic circumstances', and in my opinion they absolutely can. In fact, every campaign I've ever ran since the end of high school starts out for the first 6-10 sessions as exactly 'everyman struggling in extraordinary circumstances'. </p><p></p><p>My latest campaign began with an (apparently) 'mundane' tsunami. It featured alot of running, balance checks, jump checks, escape artist checks, diplomacy checks, intimidation checks, heal checks, swim checks, strength checks, and so forth by characters with either no or basically mundane skills for survival. How fast you could run was far more important than how well you swung a sword, and most of our nascent heroes ran at purely mundane 'everyman' speeds. It had no fireballs, no dragons, no dungeons, and the little combat it had was lethal - CR 2 killing machines versus 1st level characters with little or no armor and few weapons. Half the party was unconscious and bleeding at one point. Does that sound like 'big bad-ass heroes'? Are you telling me it wasn't D&D? Well what was it?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 5147055, member: 4937"] Which is like saying that playing a game of Call of Cthulu which doesn't end with everyone insane or dead is "no longer playing the game as it was designed". You are conflating a particular sterotype of play with all the possible play available under the rules. It's perfectly possible to play a session or even a whole campaign of Chaosium Call of Cthullu with no mythos elements at all, or [I]even with no supernatural elements at all[/I]. For example, I can imagine running non-supernatural horror elements under Chaosium CoC such as a game set in the trenches of WWI, or a game in which you Victorian era explorers of Africa, the Amazon, or Antarctica (read "you are modern big badass adventurers"). Neither game need have anything more than mundane horror in it. I could also run a game of D&D set in the trenches of WWI or where you are 'real world' explorers of Africa, the Amazon, or Antartica which would be every bit as grim and gritty as the Chaosium Call of Cthullu game in the same setting. Granted, I'd have to port in house rules for horror/madness (from Ravenloft, a D&D setting) and firearms (from Ken's Grim and Gritty rules), and maybe add some additional non-standard class options like 'Explorer' and 'Scholar' (many options here) to provide mundane variaty, but it would be rules written for a D&D game being used in a non-traditional manner. And here's the really important part. I don't know if anyone has ever ran CoC with no supernatural elements for any extended period, but I do know that people have ran D&D in highly non-traditional settings for extended periods. One of the coolest settings I've heard about at EnWorld was someone was running Ice Age/Stone Age D&D. You can't say to some running a game of D&D set in real world Rome that they aren't playing D&D just because there are no dragons and fireballs. It's a very non-traditional game of D&D, but its still recognizably D&D in its mechanics. And mechanics are what this thread is about. The fact that the fluff traditionally implies that the mechanics represent something else is irrevelent. The question is, can the mechanics handle being repurposed for some other non-traditional fluff like 'everyman struggling in heroic circumstances', and in my opinion they absolutely can. In fact, every campaign I've ever ran since the end of high school starts out for the first 6-10 sessions as exactly 'everyman struggling in extraordinary circumstances'. My latest campaign began with an (apparently) 'mundane' tsunami. It featured alot of running, balance checks, jump checks, escape artist checks, diplomacy checks, intimidation checks, heal checks, swim checks, strength checks, and so forth by characters with either no or basically mundane skills for survival. How fast you could run was far more important than how well you swung a sword, and most of our nascent heroes ran at purely mundane 'everyman' speeds. It had no fireballs, no dragons, no dungeons, and the little combat it had was lethal - CR 2 killing machines versus 1st level characters with little or no armor and few weapons. Half the party was unconscious and bleeding at one point. Does that sound like 'big bad-ass heroes'? Are you telling me it wasn't D&D? Well what was it? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Favorite actual/wished for fantasy character that wouldn't work well with D&D rules
Top