Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Favorite Obscure Rules from TSR-era D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 9361128" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>That thing at the end is weird, and/or (probably and) I don't understand what you're saying. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>I would definitely not read more into high Comeliness than just attractiveness. Basically, if I would use it, I would use it as a convenient shorthand for a lengthy description. For PCs it's okay to write down exactly how someone looks, but for a NPC, just rolling 3d6 for Comeliness tells me everything I need to know, at least as long as that character remains peripheral to the story. (In modern times, having the AI generate a portrait is kind of the best of both words) I would say Comeliness basically is Charisma before you get to know the person. First impressions stuff. Sure, having a supernaturally high value could mesmerize someone, but really, that's Charisma's job.</p><p></p><p>The gender rules from Dragon #3 are best left buried. So many D&D house rules that can't see that women can be just as thirsty as men. The common idea "female heroes have lower Strength but higher Charisma" completely fails to realize that women get just as bedazzled by charismatic males* as men are bedazzled by charismatic females* (with minor differences in execution).</p><p>*) and other persons</p><p></p><p>I feel that much better than to use rules like artificially limiting female characters' Strength (that Dragon article has females roll 1d8+1d6 for Strength instead of 3d6) which in practice just completely shuts the door to Strength builds, is, if you use gender disparity rules at all, restrict the frequency rather than the capacity of really strong female characters.</p><p></p><p>In a recent Sword & Sorcery campaign inspired by 80s movies like Conan I ran (it didn't use 1E rules, it used DCC rules, but still) I did not make female heroes roll lower Strength scores than males. Instead the players generate characters as usual, but after rolling Strength they roll for gender with the Strength modifier modifying the roll. This way, an 18 Strength female hero is perfectly possible and she is not limited in any way, shape or form... unlikely, but not restricted or held back.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 9361128, member: 12731"] That thing at the end is weird, and/or (probably and) I don't understand what you're saying. :) I would definitely not read more into high Comeliness than just attractiveness. Basically, if I would use it, I would use it as a convenient shorthand for a lengthy description. For PCs it's okay to write down exactly how someone looks, but for a NPC, just rolling 3d6 for Comeliness tells me everything I need to know, at least as long as that character remains peripheral to the story. (In modern times, having the AI generate a portrait is kind of the best of both words) I would say Comeliness basically is Charisma before you get to know the person. First impressions stuff. Sure, having a supernaturally high value could mesmerize someone, but really, that's Charisma's job. The gender rules from Dragon #3 are best left buried. So many D&D house rules that can't see that women can be just as thirsty as men. The common idea "female heroes have lower Strength but higher Charisma" completely fails to realize that women get just as bedazzled by charismatic males* as men are bedazzled by charismatic females* (with minor differences in execution). *) and other persons I feel that much better than to use rules like artificially limiting female characters' Strength (that Dragon article has females roll 1d8+1d6 for Strength instead of 3d6) which in practice just completely shuts the door to Strength builds, is, if you use gender disparity rules at all, restrict the frequency rather than the capacity of really strong female characters. In a recent Sword & Sorcery campaign inspired by 80s movies like Conan I ran (it didn't use 1E rules, it used DCC rules, but still) I did not make female heroes roll lower Strength scores than males. Instead the players generate characters as usual, but after rolling Strength they roll for gender with the Strength modifier modifying the roll. This way, an 18 Strength female hero is perfectly possible and she is not limited in any way, shape or form... unlikely, but not restricted or held back. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
Favorite Obscure Rules from TSR-era D&D
Top