Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
FDA approves "The Chip", a step to the future, or to The End?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raging Epistaxis" data-source="post: 1816849" data-attributes="member: 1169"><p><strong>RFID chips - my $0.02</strong></p><p></p><p>If the human versions work the same as the non-human (veterinary) chips, all the scanner reads is the number.</p><p></p><p>The number in and of itself means nothing without access to a database that matches the number with whatever info is stored in the database. In the case of pets, that is the info sent in by the owners themselves when they register the chip. </p><p></p><p>I would think that things would be similar on the human side, you'd need access to whatever database for a illicitly read number to mean anything. It is a little frightening that there could be access to this info by others than those it is intended for, but then again, there is already a lot of info about us out there already if one knows where to look. Ever Googled yourself? Educational.</p><p></p><p>All in all, I'm not much more afraid of this technology than I am of what might happen if someone stole my wallet, and at least the chip has potential benefits. Not that I'll be first in line to get them, but at least I'd seriously consider it.</p><p></p><p>Some of the paranoid claims I've heard/read various places about these chips being able to be tracked by satellite are just absurd. These chips are not transmitters - they are passive converters, relying on energy from the received radio waves. If a satellite is putting out that much energy, we're all getting a good internal tan. </p><p></p><p>From personal conversations with someone in the industry, the best scanners they have can read a chip when the dog walks through a doorway sized opening - similar to antitheft devices at stores - but the FCC won't let them be used.</p><p></p><p>Worst case scenario: Even if they could somehow track the chip from space, and the government goes all fascist on us, or something similar that makes me want to be a resistance fighter, the chip comes out and goes away. </p><p></p><p>Best case scenario: I'm in the emergency room unconscious with no ID and they immediately know I'm asthmatic with multiple drug allergies, including penicillin. Save my life? Sure, sign me up.</p><p></p><p>Sorry for the diatribe, but at least I didn't get too political or at all religious.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/nervous.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":heh:" title="Nervous Laugh :heh:" data-shortname=":heh:" /> </p><p>And, Eric's Grandma: Googling one's self is not a euphamism for something morally reprehensible... :-D</p><p>RE</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raging Epistaxis, post: 1816849, member: 1169"] [b]RFID chips - my $0.02[/b] If the human versions work the same as the non-human (veterinary) chips, all the scanner reads is the number. The number in and of itself means nothing without access to a database that matches the number with whatever info is stored in the database. In the case of pets, that is the info sent in by the owners themselves when they register the chip. I would think that things would be similar on the human side, you'd need access to whatever database for a illicitly read number to mean anything. It is a little frightening that there could be access to this info by others than those it is intended for, but then again, there is already a lot of info about us out there already if one knows where to look. Ever Googled yourself? Educational. All in all, I'm not much more afraid of this technology than I am of what might happen if someone stole my wallet, and at least the chip has potential benefits. Not that I'll be first in line to get them, but at least I'd seriously consider it. Some of the paranoid claims I've heard/read various places about these chips being able to be tracked by satellite are just absurd. These chips are not transmitters - they are passive converters, relying on energy from the received radio waves. If a satellite is putting out that much energy, we're all getting a good internal tan. From personal conversations with someone in the industry, the best scanners they have can read a chip when the dog walks through a doorway sized opening - similar to antitheft devices at stores - but the FCC won't let them be used. Worst case scenario: Even if they could somehow track the chip from space, and the government goes all fascist on us, or something similar that makes me want to be a resistance fighter, the chip comes out and goes away. Best case scenario: I'm in the emergency room unconscious with no ID and they immediately know I'm asthmatic with multiple drug allergies, including penicillin. Save my life? Sure, sign me up. Sorry for the diatribe, but at least I didn't get too political or at all religious.:heh: And, Eric's Grandma: Googling one's self is not a euphamism for something morally reprehensible... :-D RE [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
FDA approves "The Chip", a step to the future, or to The End?
Top