Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Problems With PHB II
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 2827555" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>To add to this, an unbalanced feat is an unbalanced feat regardless.</p><p></p><p>In the case of Indomitable Will, the DM always used to have his Enchantment (and even certain types of Illusionist) specialist NPCs throw Charm and Hold and Dominate, etc. against the PC tanks because it was obvious to the NPCs that these PCs should be the most susceptible to those types of magical attacks.</p><p></p><p>Now, a PC Fighter or Barbarian takes Indomitable Will. Sure, it cost him 3 feats. But, the DM is now stuck in a situation where only Reoccuring Villain Enchantment Specialist NPCs should eventually figure out that you cannot charm the PC Fighter. Every other Enchantment Specialist NPC should by default target this Fighter (at some point in the combat) and waste a few rounds every combat finding out that the Fighter almost always saves. Not only that, but it changes other aspects of these types of encounters. For example, if the Fighter saves more often because of this, then the Cleric and/or Wizard does not have to cast as many Dispel Magic spells to counter a Domination.</p><p></p><p>Eventually, it becomes so bad (and boring) that the DM stops sending these types of NPCs against the group.</p><p></p><p>And, it is all due to the fact that the feat is unbalanced. Remember, this feat can be acquired at 3rd level. +2 to Will saves is balanced. Two Will saves pick the better of the two (both at +2 btw) is not. Any game mechanic where you can roll two D20, pick the better of the two rolls and oh by the way, you can do this every single time this roll comes up in the game and are not limited to set number of times per day (like one), the feat is unbalanced.</p><p></p><p>Third level Fighter with Wisdom 10 has +1 to Will saves. Against a third level Cleric with a 16 Wisdom and Hold Person, he saves 35% of the time. If he takes Indomitable Will, he saves 69.75% of the time. Effectively, he just got a +7 to his save, +5 more than taking Iron Will alone, the equivalent of a +5 magic item for a feat.</p><p></p><p>No feat in the game so far gives +5 to a save TMK. This one easily can.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 2827555, member: 2011"] To add to this, an unbalanced feat is an unbalanced feat regardless. In the case of Indomitable Will, the DM always used to have his Enchantment (and even certain types of Illusionist) specialist NPCs throw Charm and Hold and Dominate, etc. against the PC tanks because it was obvious to the NPCs that these PCs should be the most susceptible to those types of magical attacks. Now, a PC Fighter or Barbarian takes Indomitable Will. Sure, it cost him 3 feats. But, the DM is now stuck in a situation where only Reoccuring Villain Enchantment Specialist NPCs should eventually figure out that you cannot charm the PC Fighter. Every other Enchantment Specialist NPC should by default target this Fighter (at some point in the combat) and waste a few rounds every combat finding out that the Fighter almost always saves. Not only that, but it changes other aspects of these types of encounters. For example, if the Fighter saves more often because of this, then the Cleric and/or Wizard does not have to cast as many Dispel Magic spells to counter a Domination. Eventually, it becomes so bad (and boring) that the DM stops sending these types of NPCs against the group. And, it is all due to the fact that the feat is unbalanced. Remember, this feat can be acquired at 3rd level. +2 to Will saves is balanced. Two Will saves pick the better of the two (both at +2 btw) is not. Any game mechanic where you can roll two D20, pick the better of the two rolls and oh by the way, you can do this every single time this roll comes up in the game and are not limited to set number of times per day (like one), the feat is unbalanced. Third level Fighter with Wisdom 10 has +1 to Will saves. Against a third level Cleric with a 16 Wisdom and Hold Person, he saves 35% of the time. If he takes Indomitable Will, he saves 69.75% of the time. Effectively, he just got a +7 to his save, +5 more than taking Iron Will alone, the equivalent of a +5 magic item for a feat. No feat in the game so far gives +5 to a save TMK. This one easily can. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Problems With PHB II
Top