Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 5532121" data-attributes="member: 59057">Did read the thread, just don´t read those statements as you do. I can´t believe it was pure oversight. In guess they had a reason to change the scaling during the beta... and i guess they realized, in an optimized group, enemies were hit very easy, and i guess leader bonuses were one reason for that...I however believe, that there were things, the developers broke shortly before finallizing the rules... and i guess it was not the developers inability to count to 29, but some wrong estimations.And 8 rounds of combat in epic still seem reasonable, i won´t repeat, why i believe such things... it is just, that it was implemented in a way, that could get frustrating:leaders not hitting well enough or having no leaders that have to hit bonus powers broke the assumptions...I read you were at gen con, but i guess the real oversight was that leaders in the final version (I don´t know previous versions) can´t do their job if they are hitting less than 55%, which they did...edit:i adressed your post and tried to answer... your only defense is "i was at gen con and developers also use houserules NOW"You still don´t know why they changed the scaling, and they didn´t tell you why they did... i guess it wasn´t: "hey, it is working perfectly now... why not change it arbitrarily?"And you are still rude, and ignorant of it...</blockquote>