Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5545088" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>Fair enough. I do certainly get what you are saying - if a player feels the need to take Expertise instead of an RP feat, wouldn't they feel the same urge with Superior Weapon Proficiency or similar choices? And there may be some truth to that.</p><p> </p><p>Still, though, I think the sheer difference in power level makes Expertise stand out. Especially once you hit Paragon and the bonus as started to ramp up - I might take every other choices based on what fits the concept, but by that point, at least one feat pretty much feels reserved for Expertise. I might not feel the lack of Toughness or a Superior Weapon, but would definitely feel the lack of Expertise. </p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Just to clarify, I'm pretty firmly in the camp that the math <em>isn't </em>broken in the first place. The few numbers that diminish on the PC side of the fence by epic levels are more than made up for by the greater number of powers and, generally, the sorts of benefits and capabilities that are being thrown around by that level, even accounting for enemies <em>also </em>having more potent abilities. That was what I suspected from the start, and my experience has largely born it out. </p><p> </p><p>Now, I won't say that my experience is universal or that I know any of this for an absolute fact. But I think that if WotC had never released the Expertise feats, the game would not have suffered in the slightest. It is one of several areas where I think WotC made a kneejerk response to a problem, and even if there was a problem in need of fixing, the response was disproportionate to the cause. (See also: Skill Challenge DCs and their first 'fix'.) </p><p> </p><p>That said, its true that WotC isn't likely to just remove the Expertise feats from the game at this point, and <em>instead </em>has largely focused on amping up the power level of other feats to try and match them. (Which I'm not especially a fan of either). While also amping up the danger and difficulty of monsters so they aren't overwhelmed by the power creep of the characters. </p><p> </p><p>There certainly doesn't seem to be any quick and easy solution that would fix things for the game as a whole - though, in my own game, I'm relatively confident I can remove the Expertise feats entirely without any real damage done. </p><p> </p><p>I admit you may be correct that no matter what we argue, this is an area of the game that isn't likely to change at this point - Essentials has shown that rather than back away from this decision, WotC has pretty much embraced it wholesale.</p><p> </p><p>Of course, my original input here was mainly to try and counter the position you seemed to be mocking people for - and I don't think you intended any insult, and <em>were </em>genuinely just pointing out what seemed like an absurdity to you. But it came across as assigning a straw man argument to the other side of the debate, and then mocking them because of that. </p><p> </p><p>And so I felt the need to weigh in, and offer up both other legitimate reasons for a dislike of the feat, as well as to point out that the Expertise feats are potent enough that, honestly, it isn't that simple to compare them with other 'good' feats. And, having made that case, that probably would have been the appropriate time for me to let the matter lie and depart the thread, but I've never been especially good at that. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5545088, member: 61155"] Fair enough. I do certainly get what you are saying - if a player feels the need to take Expertise instead of an RP feat, wouldn't they feel the same urge with Superior Weapon Proficiency or similar choices? And there may be some truth to that. Still, though, I think the sheer difference in power level makes Expertise stand out. Especially once you hit Paragon and the bonus as started to ramp up - I might take every other choices based on what fits the concept, but by that point, at least one feat pretty much feels reserved for Expertise. I might not feel the lack of Toughness or a Superior Weapon, but would definitely feel the lack of Expertise. Just to clarify, I'm pretty firmly in the camp that the math [I]isn't [/I]broken in the first place. The few numbers that diminish on the PC side of the fence by epic levels are more than made up for by the greater number of powers and, generally, the sorts of benefits and capabilities that are being thrown around by that level, even accounting for enemies [I]also [/I]having more potent abilities. That was what I suspected from the start, and my experience has largely born it out. Now, I won't say that my experience is universal or that I know any of this for an absolute fact. But I think that if WotC had never released the Expertise feats, the game would not have suffered in the slightest. It is one of several areas where I think WotC made a kneejerk response to a problem, and even if there was a problem in need of fixing, the response was disproportionate to the cause. (See also: Skill Challenge DCs and their first 'fix'.) That said, its true that WotC isn't likely to just remove the Expertise feats from the game at this point, and [I]instead [/I]has largely focused on amping up the power level of other feats to try and match them. (Which I'm not especially a fan of either). While also amping up the danger and difficulty of monsters so they aren't overwhelmed by the power creep of the characters. There certainly doesn't seem to be any quick and easy solution that would fix things for the game as a whole - though, in my own game, I'm relatively confident I can remove the Expertise feats entirely without any real damage done. I admit you may be correct that no matter what we argue, this is an area of the game that isn't likely to change at this point - Essentials has shown that rather than back away from this decision, WotC has pretty much embraced it wholesale. Of course, my original input here was mainly to try and counter the position you seemed to be mocking people for - and I don't think you intended any insult, and [I]were [/I]genuinely just pointing out what seemed like an absurdity to you. But it came across as assigning a straw man argument to the other side of the debate, and then mocking them because of that. And so I felt the need to weigh in, and offer up both other legitimate reasons for a dislike of the feat, as well as to point out that the Expertise feats are potent enough that, honestly, it isn't that simple to compare them with other 'good' feats. And, having made that case, that probably would have been the appropriate time for me to let the matter lie and depart the thread, but I've never been especially good at that. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
Top