Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aulirophile" data-source="post: 5545409" data-attributes="member: 86312">Thankfully you don't have to agree for me to be right. Again, you're welcome to go and do the math for the baseline assumptions, which as I continually have to point out to you, is an upper bound. There is no designed limit in the other direction so it doesn't matter if options increase PC power over the baseline (though, in fact, every such upper bound has been changed barring two, so clearly one exists even though we aren't aware of it, but it is in the realm of one-rounding solos by yourself for the most part if the changes are any indication) as far as the system is concerned. Your counter-argument is null. The math is perfectly extensive enough (more then, actually) to account for the designer's intent. Also if Skill DC's were a mistake, and you accept that because Devs said so, why don't you accept that the scaling was a mistake, when the Devs said so? Hypocrite much? Because the objective conclusion of one aspect of the system was one you agreed with was fixed, that was a mistake, but this other aspect of the system you don't agree with wasn't? When we have the same objective basis for both: The devs said it was a mistake. Fantastic logic there sport.You are demonstrably incapable of separating fact from your biased opinion. And the system is flawed isn't my conclusion from the facts, it is a fact period, because the people who built the system said so. Fact: System flawed. The math is the conclusion of why. You have it backwards.</blockquote>

Verification