Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrGrenadine" data-source="post: 5553588" data-attributes="member: 62619"><p>I'm all for better tactics, but I'm not sure being thoughtful during combat is as elegant and useful a fix as a simple and consistent +1/2/3.</p><p></p><p>In your example, knocking the 'to hit' target down from 20 is never going to be as simple as flanking to get to 18, and aiding another to get to 16, etc. All of those buffs are conditional, need a hit to take effect, last only one round, and can easily be disrupted by tactics on the opposing side.</p><p></p><p>For instance, in your example, Character #1 moves to flank and has to hit with a 20, and then the Character #2 moves to flank and can hit on an 18. Then Character #3 aids the one character who hasn't yet attacked--Character #4--so he needs an 18. Assuming Character #4 has a power that gives a +2 to hit to another character, hits with his power, and chooses the first of the flanking attackers, then next round Character #1 will be able to hit with a 16...unless of course, on its turn, the monster shifted out of the flank, and/or hit one of the flankers with a power that caused a status effect that disrupted the flanking or simply made a character lose its attack that round, etc.</p><p></p><p>So, 'yes' to better tactics, and 'yes' to teamwork, but good tactics + teamwork are conditional and not reliable and characters are not always in perfect synergy, so they =/= fixed math.</p><p></p><p>And then consider the issue of resource management as well. A character could try to hit a high defense with an Encounter or Daily, and miss more often than not and lose that power for the rest of the encounter, or longer. Or, in my Cleric's case, he could use an At Will to do 1W damage and give a character +2 to an attack vs the same target (until EoNT), but if thats the case, why does my character even have Encounter and Daily attack powers? If they're tough to hit with, and using them makes it tougher for everyone else to hit, too, I may as well just spam my measly 1W At Will the whole battle, which would be the opposite of fun.</p><p></p><p>All that being said, if taking one feat gets me closer to hitting more than half the time, I'll take it--especially with a leader, who is of no use to a party if he can't hit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrGrenadine, post: 5553588, member: 62619"] I'm all for better tactics, but I'm not sure being thoughtful during combat is as elegant and useful a fix as a simple and consistent +1/2/3. In your example, knocking the 'to hit' target down from 20 is never going to be as simple as flanking to get to 18, and aiding another to get to 16, etc. All of those buffs are conditional, need a hit to take effect, last only one round, and can easily be disrupted by tactics on the opposing side. For instance, in your example, Character #1 moves to flank and has to hit with a 20, and then the Character #2 moves to flank and can hit on an 18. Then Character #3 aids the one character who hasn't yet attacked--Character #4--so he needs an 18. Assuming Character #4 has a power that gives a +2 to hit to another character, hits with his power, and chooses the first of the flanking attackers, then next round Character #1 will be able to hit with a 16...unless of course, on its turn, the monster shifted out of the flank, and/or hit one of the flankers with a power that caused a status effect that disrupted the flanking or simply made a character lose its attack that round, etc. So, 'yes' to better tactics, and 'yes' to teamwork, but good tactics + teamwork are conditional and not reliable and characters are not always in perfect synergy, so they =/= fixed math. And then consider the issue of resource management as well. A character could try to hit a high defense with an Encounter or Daily, and miss more often than not and lose that power for the rest of the encounter, or longer. Or, in my Cleric's case, he could use an At Will to do 1W damage and give a character +2 to an attack vs the same target (until EoNT), but if thats the case, why does my character even have Encounter and Daily attack powers? If they're tough to hit with, and using them makes it tougher for everyone else to hit, too, I may as well just spam my measly 1W At Will the whole battle, which would be the opposite of fun. All that being said, if taking one feat gets me closer to hitting more than half the time, I'll take it--especially with a leader, who is of no use to a party if he can't hit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
Top