Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MrMyth" data-source="post: 5558440" data-attributes="member: 61155"><p>The problem remains that you keep treating these two sentences as identical, when they are completely disconnected. Yes, you fall behind by 4. </p><p> </p><p>You also quadruple the number of encounter and daily powers, not to mention utility powers, paragon path and epic destiny features, over a dozen feats and numerous magic items.... with many of those abilities being, by far, more potent than similar abilities at level 1. </p><p> </p><p>Now, you <em>feel </em>this doesn't compensate for the lost 4 points of bonuses. You claim that all those benefits only amount to the equivalent of a +1 bonus to hit, presumably, since Expertise would make up for the other 3 points. I don't agree, myself, but I can somewhat see how you could make such an assumption, presumably based on the idea that monster capabilities also scale, even if not to the same extent. </p><p> </p><p>But the idea that that is the <em>only </em>interpretation is where I really have to disagree. I can accept that you <em>feel </em>the lost numbers are far more significant than the acquired powers, items, feats and features. But your claim is that you have mathematically <em>proven </em>that this is so... and you haven't. We haven't seen any such math. </p><p> </p><p>For myself, I'll maintain that the various benefits PCs acquire over the levels more than make up for the lost points of raw math. Especially given those benefits can include those lost points <em>and more</em>. Feel free to disagree, sure, but you certainly haven't proven your interpretation any more mathematically correct than our own.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MrMyth, post: 5558440, member: 61155"] The problem remains that you keep treating these two sentences as identical, when they are completely disconnected. Yes, you fall behind by 4. You also quadruple the number of encounter and daily powers, not to mention utility powers, paragon path and epic destiny features, over a dozen feats and numerous magic items.... with many of those abilities being, by far, more potent than similar abilities at level 1. Now, you [I]feel [/I]this doesn't compensate for the lost 4 points of bonuses. You claim that all those benefits only amount to the equivalent of a +1 bonus to hit, presumably, since Expertise would make up for the other 3 points. I don't agree, myself, but I can somewhat see how you could make such an assumption, presumably based on the idea that monster capabilities also scale, even if not to the same extent. But the idea that that is the [I]only [/I]interpretation is where I really have to disagree. I can accept that you [I]feel [/I]the lost numbers are far more significant than the acquired powers, items, feats and features. But your claim is that you have mathematically [I]proven [/I]that this is so... and you haven't. We haven't seen any such math. For myself, I'll maintain that the various benefits PCs acquire over the levels more than make up for the lost points of raw math. Especially given those benefits can include those lost points [I]and more[/I]. Feel free to disagree, sure, but you certainly haven't proven your interpretation any more mathematically correct than our own. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Feat Taxes, or, It's That Time of the Week Again
Top