Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 7044131" data-attributes="member: 15700">This pretty much sums up my position and feelings as well.  AD&D was my preferred edition all the way up until 5e came out, so naturally I have not problems playing a fighter without feats.  I certainly don't think it's boring.  Probably because what makes a PC boring or not is how I play their personality, and has very little to do with a power or ability.  And being an AD&D guy for so long, you'd be surprised at how much can be done via simple ability checks.That doesn't mean I'm against feats.  I actually like them.  I think they make multi-classing extinct, which is a great thing.  But not having them isn't going to deter me from playing a fighter.Say what now?  This doesn't make any sense.  Fighters are mundane, if you take away their items.  I've been playing fighters for 35 years and there was nothing inherently magical about the class at all.  There was no spellcasting, no bending of reality, none of that.  I mean, I can literally point to the class itself and find not a single magical thing about it, which by definition makes them mundane.</blockquote>