Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="AaronOfBarbaria" data-source="post: 7045793" data-attributes="member: 6701872">Thanks.I laughed out loud when reading this, and said &quot;Well... duh.&quot; even though no one was around to hear me. So thanks for that too.My error actually ended up being trying too hard to remember; I was doing all the addition before the subtraction, because I remembered the acronym and what each letter stood for, but not how to actually act upon that information correctly.Thanks for breaking down the whole process, too. It's kind of cool to see all the steps, and to find out that the advice I'd been giving my players (which was &quot;Probably not going to take your opponent down faster by taking the -5 to hit if you need a roll of 11+ on the die to hit without the -5&quot;) wasn't too far off from what math says.Edit to add: and thanks to you too, [MENTION=4556]Valdier[/MENTION]. Didn't notice you'd also helped me with my math before I originally posted this.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="AaronOfBarbaria, post: 7045793, member: 6701872"] Thanks. I laughed out loud when reading this, and said "Well... duh." even though no one was around to hear me. So thanks for that too. My error actually ended up being trying too hard to remember; I was doing all the addition before the subtraction, because I remembered the acronym and what each letter stood for, but not how to actually act upon that information correctly. Thanks for breaking down the whole process, too. It's kind of cool to see all the steps, and to find out that the advice I'd been giving my players (which was "Probably not going to take your opponent down faster by taking the -5 to hit if you need a roll of 11+ on the die to hit without the -5") wasn't too far off from what math says. Edit to add: and thanks to you too, [MENTION=4556]Valdier[/MENTION]. Didn't notice you'd also helped me with my math before I originally posted this. [/QUOTE]

Verification